Back

Dietary Iodine Intake in Urban and Rural North India: Implications for and Compatibility with Salt Reduction Efforts.

Mohan, S.; Kaushik, A.; Gupta, P.; Singh, K.; Gupta, R.; Prabhakaran, D.

2025-03-11 public and global health
10.1101/2025.03.10.25323709 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveThe World Health Organization (WHO) recommends reducing dietary salt intake to <5gm/d as a cost-effective strategy to reduce hypertension and associated cardiovascular diseases. However, salt is also used as a vehicle for iodine supplementation for preventing iodine deficiency disorders (IDD). Concerns have been expressed that reducing population salt intake will adversely impact iodine levels. Therefore, the aim of this paper was to estimate the daily salt and iodine consumption levels of the adult population in India and examine the effect of the WHO recommended salt intake levels on iodine levels. MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted in Delhi and Haryana, India among adults aged [&ge;]20 years and 24-hr urine samples were collected to assess the salt and iodine levels . FindingsThe mean salt intake was 8.07 gm/d (95% CI: 7.03-9.11), mean urinary iodine concentration (UIC) was 208.90 {micro}g/L (184.53-233.27), and the mean urinary iodine excretion (UIE) was 276.15 {micro}g/24hr (239.68-312.62). Analysis to assess iodine intake adequacy by salt intake levels indicated that the mean UIC [180.35 {micro}g/L (159.49-201.20), as well as UIE [153.67 {micro}g/24hr (127.51-179.83)], were adequate, when salt intake was as per the WHO recommended level i.e., [&le;]5gm/d. ConclusionEven at the WHO recommended salt intake levels, population iodine intake in this study population was adequate, likely indicating that upward titration in iodine concentration in salt may not be required. Thus, current salt reduction recommendations are unlikely to impact iodine supplementation efforts, indicating compatibility between the two interventions, which should be continiously monitored through robust surveillance.

Published in The Journal of Nutrition · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.