Can we enhance neurorehabilitation through regional implementation of group-based telerehabilitation? A mixed methods evaluation of NeuroRehabilitation OnLine (NROL).
Ackerley, S.; Mason, T.; Partington, A.; Peel, R.; Vernon, H.; Connell, L. A.
Show abstract
ObjectivesTo determine whether neurorehabilitation can be enhanced through regional implementation of group-based telerehabilitation, we implemented the NeuroRehabilitation OnLine (NROL) innovation regionally and evaluated scale-up from a systems perspective. DesignObservational, exploratory evaluation using a mixed methods convergent parallel design. SettingStroke and neurological rehabilitation services from four organisations across a regional healthcare system in the United Kingdom. ParticipantsTherapy staff from community-based services and patients with a stroke or neurological condition receiving active community rehabilitation including NROL from April 2022 to March 2024. InterventionA regional multidisciplinary group-based neurological telerehabilitation innovation, Neuro Rehabilitation OnLine (NROL). Primary outcome measuresSelected Proctors implementation outcomes, to establish system-level adoption, acceptability and sustainability of the regional NROL innovation. ResultsNROL was adopted by all intended organisations and continues as part of usual care with participation growing. It was acceptable to therapy staff and patients across the region, well-utilised, valued, and supported increased therapy provision. For sustainability, staffing and travel efficiencies were identified through effective collaborative regional systems working. The importance of continued wide stakeholder engagement, robust evaluation and alignment was highlighted. ConclusionsNROL was successfully embedded into real-world practice at a system-level and enhanced neurorehabilitation. Looking forward, longer-term sustainment of this innovation will require a compelling business case and value proposition for decision-makers, addressing economic, equality, and operational efficiency considerations. ARTICLE SUMMARYO_ST_ABSStrengths and limitations of this studyC_ST_ABSO_LIWithin a clinical-academic partnership, robust mixed methods evaluation enabled comprehensive system-level insights into the scale-up of a group-based telerehabilitation innovation C_LIO_LIOur approach was strengthened by using established implementation science outcomes and frameworks C_LIO_LIUse of real-world routinely collected data was pragmatic and integral to the models embedded nature but limited the focus of insight predominantly to those who participated in NROL C_LIO_LIDecision-maker perspective was not formally captured but will be an important next step, alongside gaining opinion from those who did not participate C_LI
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Practitioner, patient and public views on the acceptability of Mobile Stroke Units in England and Wales: a mixed methods study 95%
- Mapping rehabilitation pathways after cardiac surgery: Identifying key points for patient involvement and gaps in care 95%
- Use of patient centred outcomes measures alongside the personal wheelchair budget process in NHS England: a mixed methods approach to exploring the staff and service user experience of using the WATCh and WATCh-Ad Tools 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of TeleStroke Consultations to Support the Care of Stroke Patients Presenting to Regional Emergency Departments in Western Australia: An Economic Evaluation Case Study Protocol 94%
- Synthesizing evidence regarding community-based volunteer facilitated programs supporting integrated care transitions from hospital to home: A scoping review protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Health Navigator intervention to address the unmet social needs of caregivers of hospitalised children in South Australia: protocol for a mixed-methods pilot study 93%
- Improving cardiovascular health in patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm: Development of the Cardiovascular risk reduction in patients with aneurysms (CRISP) behaviour change intervention 92%
- The MultimorbiditY COllaborative Medication Review And DEcision Making (MyComrade) study: A protocol for a cross-border pilot cluster randomised controlled trial 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and evaluation of rapid data-enabled access to routine clinical information to enhance early recruitment to the national clinical platform trial of COVID-19 community treatments 91%
- Development of a consensus extension of the estimands framework for cluster randomised trials (CRT-estimands): results from an international Delphi study 91%
- Moderate-Intensity Exercise Versus High-Intensity Interval Training to Recover Walking Post-Stroke: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Listening to older voices: Results of a cross-sectional survey of older patient-reported experiences of facility-based healthcare in Nouna, Burkina Faso 91%
- A Clinical Audit on Longer-Term Stroke Management as A Specific Service in A Primary Care Setting: Assessing Adherence of Service and Clinical Parameters 91%
- A qualitative study on factors influencing health workers’ uptake of a pilot surgical antibiotic prophylaxis stewardship programme in selected Georgian hospitals 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.