Back

Can we enhance neurorehabilitation through regional implementation of group-based telerehabilitation? A mixed methods evaluation of NeuroRehabilitation OnLine (NROL).

Ackerley, S.; Mason, T.; Partington, A.; Peel, R.; Vernon, H.; Connell, L. A.

2025-03-14 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.1101/2025.03.10.25323664 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesTo determine whether neurorehabilitation can be enhanced through regional implementation of group-based telerehabilitation, we implemented the NeuroRehabilitation OnLine (NROL) innovation regionally and evaluated scale-up from a systems perspective. DesignObservational, exploratory evaluation using a mixed methods convergent parallel design. SettingStroke and neurological rehabilitation services from four organisations across a regional healthcare system in the United Kingdom. ParticipantsTherapy staff from community-based services and patients with a stroke or neurological condition receiving active community rehabilitation including NROL from April 2022 to March 2024. InterventionA regional multidisciplinary group-based neurological telerehabilitation innovation, Neuro Rehabilitation OnLine (NROL). Primary outcome measuresSelected Proctors implementation outcomes, to establish system-level adoption, acceptability and sustainability of the regional NROL innovation. ResultsNROL was adopted by all intended organisations and continues as part of usual care with participation growing. It was acceptable to therapy staff and patients across the region, well-utilised, valued, and supported increased therapy provision. For sustainability, staffing and travel efficiencies were identified through effective collaborative regional systems working. The importance of continued wide stakeholder engagement, robust evaluation and alignment was highlighted. ConclusionsNROL was successfully embedded into real-world practice at a system-level and enhanced neurorehabilitation. Looking forward, longer-term sustainment of this innovation will require a compelling business case and value proposition for decision-makers, addressing economic, equality, and operational efficiency considerations. ARTICLE SUMMARYO_ST_ABSStrengths and limitations of this studyC_ST_ABSO_LIWithin a clinical-academic partnership, robust mixed methods evaluation enabled comprehensive system-level insights into the scale-up of a group-based telerehabilitation innovation C_LIO_LIOur approach was strengthened by using established implementation science outcomes and frameworks C_LIO_LIUse of real-world routinely collected data was pragmatic and integral to the models embedded nature but limited the focus of insight predominantly to those who participated in NROL C_LIO_LIDecision-maker perspective was not formally captured but will be an important next step, alongside gaining opinion from those who did not participate C_LI

Published in BMJ Open (predicted rank #2) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.