Variability in Sodium Content of Takeaway Foods: Implications for Public Health and Nutrition Policy.
Mavrochefalo, A.-I.; Dodson, A.; Kuhnle, G. G. C.
Show abstract
BackgroundExcessive sodium intake is a major modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease, yet accurately assessing dietary sodium remains challenging due to food composition variability and inaccurate menu labeling. While menu labels are intended to guide consumers, discrepancies between reported and actual sodium content could undermine their effectiveness. ObjectiveTo evaluate the accuracy of menu-declared sodium content in takeaway foods by comparing reported values with laboratory measurements. DesignA cross-sectional analysis of 39 takeaway food items from 23 outlets in Reading, UK. Sodium content was measured using Inductively Coupled Plasma - Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) and compared to menu-declared values. ResultsSodium content varied widely across food categories. Median sodium levels ranged from 0.1 g/100g (chips from fish & chips shop) to 1.6 g/100g (pizza), with some meals exceeding the 6 g/day recommended intake in a single serving. Curry dishes exhibited the greatest variability (2.3-9.4 g per dish). Significant discrepancies were found between menu-reported and measured sodium levels, with almost 50% of foods exceeding declared values. ConclusionTake-away foods exhibit substantial sodium variability, and menu labels often fail to accurately reflect actual sodium content. These findings have implications for nutritional epidemiology, where inaccurate sodium estimates may misclassify intake, and for public health, as misleading labels could hinder sodium reduction efforts. Regular validation of menu labels and improved consumer guidance are needed.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Knowledge and beliefs about dietary inorganic nitrate in a representative sample of adults from the United Kingdom 95%
- A novel web-based 24-hour dietary recall tool in line with the Nova food processing classification: description and evaluation 93%
- A novel food frequency questionnaire for Brazilian adults based on the Nova classification system: development, reproducibility and validation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Differences in Dietary Intake Exist Among U.S. Adults by Diabetic Status Using NHANES 2009-2016 93%
- Efficacy and Safety of Habitual Consumption of a Food Supplement Containing Miraculin in Malnourished Cancer Patients: the CLINMIR Pilot Study 93%
- Phenotyping women based on dietary macronutrients, physical activity and body weight using machine-learning tools 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- How do the indices based on the EAT-Lancet recommendations measure adherence to healthy and sustainable diets? A comparison of measurement performance in adults from a French national survey 95%
- A novel automated participant-recorded dietary data collection method using low-cost mobile phones and Interactive Voice Response (IVR) with low-literacy women: a validation study in rural Uganda 91%
- The cost of expanding Ethiopia’s salt iodization program to include multiple micronutrients 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ultra processed food exposure and cognitive outcomes: A systematic review of observational studies. 93%
- Changes in household purchasing of soft drinks following the UK Soft Drinks Industry Levy by household income and composition: controlled interrupted time series analysis, March 2014 to November 2019 91%
- Evaluation of different stool extraction methods for metabolomics measurements in human fecal samples 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.