Back

Non-Invasive Quantification of Viability in Spheroids Using Deep Learning

Dubinsky, D.; Harel, S.; Bein, A.; Nyska, A.; Yaari, S.; Koc, B.; Anas, F.; Bentwich, I.; Wolf, L.

2025-03-13 pharmacology and toxicology
10.1101/2025.03.09.642246 bioRxiv
Show abstract

1In vitro viability assays are widely used in drug discovery, development, and pharmacovigilance. Traditional methods for evaluating cell viability often involve destructive processes, rendering the culture non-viable. As such, these methods are suitable only as endpoint solutions, providing a single measurement per cell culture and precluding further analyses of the cells. In this study, we introduce Neural Viability Regression (NViR), a real-time, deep learning-based method that enables non-invasive quantification of culture viability using microscopy images. The non-intrusive nature of NViR allows for frequent viability evaluations throughout experiments, capturing subtle changes while maintaining the structural integrity of the culture and significantly reducing both culture and labor costs. We demonstrate NViRs applicability by using it to predict Drug-Induced Liver Injury (DILI) in known drugs. By exposing human liver spheroids to 108 FDA-approved drugs and capturing microscopy images over time, NViRs viability assessments accurately predict whether a drug induces DILI in humans, playing a critical role in enhancing liver safety protocols. The cost-effectiveness and non-invasive characteristics of NViR enable high-frequency, high-throughput viability assessments. Consequently, NViR is poised to reduce both the costs and incidences of failures in drug discovery and development.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 11%
15.8%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 1%
15.8%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 3%
12.4%
4
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
MethodsX
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
6
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
7
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
8
Translational Vision Science & Technology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
9
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
10
IFAC-PapersOnLine
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
11
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
12
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.4%
13
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
14
Artificial Intelligence in the Life Sciences
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
15
Molecules
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
16
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
17
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
40 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
18
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
19
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.0%
20
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Pharmacology
111 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
Cancer Research Communications
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Pharmaceutics
24 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
24
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
25
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
26
Mathematical Biosciences
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
27
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
122 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
28
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%
29
Clinical and Translational Science
22 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
30
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.5%