Back

Network topology creates independent control of G2-M from G1-S checkpoints in the fission yeast cell cycle system

Yamauchi, Y.; Sugiyama, H.; Goto, Y.; Aoki, K.; Mochizuki, A.

2025-03-13 systems biology
10.1101/2025.03.09.642024 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Physiological functions of cells arise from the dynamics of chemical reaction networks. The cell cycle of fission yeast is controlled by dynamical changes in two cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)-cyclin complexes based on a complicated reaction network consisting of protein synthesis, complex formation, and degradation1,2. Each of the two checkpoints, G1-S and G2-M, is driven by an increase in the concentration of CDK-Cig2 and CDK-Cdc13, respectively. However, it is not understood how these complexes in the single connected network are controlled independently in a stage-specific manner. Here we theoretically predict that independent control of CDK-Cdc13 from CDK-Cig2 is achieved by the topology of the cell cycle network, and experimentally validate this prediction, while updating the network information by comparing predictions and experiments. We analyzed a known cell cycle network using a topology-based theory3-6 and revealed that the two CDK-cyclin complexes are included in different "regulatory modules", suggesting that the concentration of each CDK-cyclin complex is controlled independently from the other. Experimental validation confirmed that the concentration of CDK-Cdc13 is controlled by the Cdc13 synthesis rate, independently from CDK-Cig2, as predicted. Conversely, the Cig2 synthesis rate affected not only CDK-Cig2 but also CDK-Cdc13. The fact, however, indicates the necessity of updating the network. We theoretically predicted the existence of an unknown necessary reaction, a Cdc13 degradation pathway, and experimentally confirmed it. The prediction and validation approach using the topology-based theory proposes a new systems biology, which progresses by comparing network structures with manipulation experiments and updating network information.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.2%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.7%
3
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.2%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.2%
5
Communications Physics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 20%
6.2%
7
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.7%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 18%
4.7%
10
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 21%
2.0%
11
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
12
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
13
Biomolecules
95 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
14
Molecular Systems Biology
142 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
15
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.3%
17
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.2%
18
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
19
Quantitative Biology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
20
Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
21
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.9%
22
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.8%
23
Biochemistry
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
25
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.6%
26
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%