Back

TISCalling: Leveraging Machine Learning to Identify Translational Initiation Sites in Plants and Viruses

Yen, M.-R.; Cheng, C.-Y.; Wu, T.-Y.; Liu, M.-J.

2025-03-11 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.03.06.641763 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The recognition of translational initiation sites (TISs) offers complementary insights into identifying genes encoding novel proteins or small peptides. Conventional computational methods primarily identify Ribo-seq-supported TISs and lack the capacity of systematical and global identification of TIS, especially for non-AUG sites in plants. Additionally, these methods are often unsuitable for evaluating the importance of mRNA sequence features for TIS determination. In this study, we present TISCalling, a robust framework that combines machine learning (ML) models and statistical analysis to identify and rank novel TISs across eukaryotes. TISCalling generalized and ranks important features common to multiple plant and mammalian species while identifying kingdom-specific features such as mRNA secondary structures and G-contents. Furthermore, TISCalling achieved high predictive power for identifying novel viral TISs. Importantly, TISCalling provides prediction scores for putative TIS along plant transcripts, enabling prioritization of those of interest for further validation. We offer TISCalling as a command-line-based package [https://github.com/yenmr/TIScalling], capable of generating prediction models and identifying key sequence features. Additionally, we provide web tools [https://predict.southerngenomics.org/TIScalling] for visualizing pre-computed potential TISs, making it accessible to users without programming experience. The TISCalling framework offers a sequence-aware and interpretable approach for decoding genome sequences and exploring functional proteins in plants and viruses.

Published in Plant Molecular Biology (predicted rank #11) · training set

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.