In Vivo Test-retest Quantitative Characterization of Echo Planar Imaging Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Reproducibility for Head and Neck Cancers on a 1.5T MR-Linac Platform: Technical Validation using QIBA Metrology
McDonald, B. A.; El-Habashy, D.; He, R.; Mulder, S.; Mirbahaeddin, S.; Mohamed, A. S. R.; Ahmed, S.; Ding, Y.; Wang, J.; Lai, S. Y.; Dresner, A.; Christodouleas, J.; Fuller, C. D.
Show abstract
Background and PurposeTo detect changes in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values during radiation therapy for biological image-guided adaptive radiation therapy, the variability in ADC must be characterized. We evaluated the reproducibility of ADC values in head and neck cancers on a 1.5T MR-linac. Methods39 head and neck cancer patients (36 primary tumors, 55 lymph nodes) were imaged with echo-planar imaging diffusion-weighted MRI on a 1.5T MR-linac at two time points before the start of radiation therapy. Mean and median ADC values and volume were measured for each lesion. Absolute and percent reproducibility coefficients (RC) were calculated. Linear regression analyses and F-tests were performed to determine whether lesion volume or time between scans impacted reproducibility. ResultsFor primary tumors & lymph nodes: mean ADC, median ADC, and volume were 1.27 {+/-} 0.33 mm2/s & 1.17 {+/-} 0.34 mm2/s, 1.25 {+/-} 0.35 & 1.16 {+/-} 0.37 mm2/s, and 8.8 {+/-} 12.3 cm3 & 6.5 {+/-} 7.2 cm3, respectively. RC values of mean ADC were 0.355 mm2/s & 0.355 mm2/s for tumors & nodes, and %RC values were 29.1% & 31.1%; values were very similar for median ADC. Reproducibility was not significantly correlated with either volume or scan interval, but a trend of poorer reproducibility in smaller volumes was observed. ConclusionConsidering previous reports that the optimal %{Delta}ADC threshold for response prediction in head and neck cancers is around 15-30%, this sequence on the MR-linac has acceptable reproducibility for detecting larger ADC changes but may still miss some clinically significant changes.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Comprehensive Quantitative Evaluation of Inter-observer Delineation Performance of MR-guided Delineation of Oropharyngeal Gross Tumor Volumes and High-risk Clinical Target Therapy: An R-IDEAL Stage 0 Prospective Study 95%
- Initial Feasibility and Clinical Implementation of Daily MR-guided Adaptive Head and Neck Cancer Radiotherapy on a 1.5T MR-Linac System: Prospective R-IDEAL 2a/2b Systematic Clinical Evaluation of Technical Innovation 94%
- Clinical Impact of Contouring Variability for Prostate Cancer Tumor Boost 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of a High-Performance Multiparametric MRI Oropharyngeal Primary Tumor Auto-Segmentation Deep Learning Model and Investigation of Input Channel Effects: Results from a Prospective Imaging Registry 96%
- Morphological changes after cranial fractionated photon radiotherapy: localized loss of white matter and grey matter volume with increasing dose 96%
- Detection of Alteration in Carotid Artery Volumetry Using Standard-of-care Computed Tomography Surveillance Scans Following Unilateral Radiation Therapy for Early-stage Tonsillar Squamous Cell Carcinoma Survivors: A Cross-Sectional Internally-Matched Carotid Isodose Analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Intermittent radiotherapy as alternative treatment for recurrent high grade glioma: A modelling study based on longitudinal tumor measurements 92%
- Correcting B0 inhomogeneity-induced distortions in whole-body diffusion MRI of bone metastases 92%
- Multiwell-based G0-PCC assay for radiation biodosimetry 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.