Predictive processing in the cortical network of biological motion perception: An fMRI-DCM study
Tunca, M.;Urgen, B.
Show abstract
Biological motion perception (BMP) is fundamental for interpreting and predicting human actions, playing a crucial role in social cognition. While traditionally viewed as a bottom-up process, recent evidence suggests that top-down mechanisms, particularly expectations, influence BMP. This fMRI study investigates how prior expectations shape BMP by employing a predictive cueing paradigm. Participants discriminated between biological and scrambled motion while presented with congruent, incongruent, or uninformative cues. Behavioral results revealed that correct expectations facilitated performance, while incorrect expectations impaired it. Dynamic Causal Modeling (DCM) analysis demonstrated bidirectional connectivity within the action observation network (AON), particularly between the posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS), posterior parietal cortex (PPC), and inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) under all expectation conditions. Additionally, Multivariate Pattern Analysis (MVPA) confirmed the involvement of these regions in BMP. These findings challenge traditional bottom-up models by highlighting the role of predictive processes in action perception and provide evidence for expectation-dependent modulation of AON connectivity.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The unique role of parietal cortex in action observation: Functional organization for communicative and manipulative actions 97%
- The anterior cingulate cortex is involved in intero-exteroceptive integration for spatial image transformation of the self-body. 97%
- Characterization of neural communication dynamics in the Ventral Attention Network across distinct spatial and spatio-temporal scales 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.