Back

Telehealth and Outpatient Utilization: Trends in Evaluation and Management Visits Among Medicare Fee-For-Service Beneficiaries, 2019-2024

Lee, J. D.; Chun, E.; Chang, C.-H.; Liu, T.; Dunn, R. L.; McCullough, J. S.; Thompson, M. P.; Ellimoottil, C.

2025-03-06 health policy
10.1101/2025.03.05.25323449 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionTelehealth expanded rapidly following the COVID-19 pandemic and has become an integral part of healthcare delivery. However, concerns remain that increased telehealth availability may contribute to higher overall healthcare utilization and spending. To assess telehealths impact on outpatient evaluation and management (E&M) visit volume, we compared overall E&M utilization before and after the pandemic across specialties with varying levels of telehealth use. MethodsWe analyzed 100% Medicare Fee-For-Service (FFS) claims to compare monthly outpatient E&M visit rates between two periods: pre-pandemic (January 2019-February 2020) and post-pandemic (January 2021-June 2024). Specialties were categorized by telehealth use as high (behavioral health), medium (primary care), and low (orthopedic surgery). A difference-in-differences (DID) analysis was used to assess changes in visit volume associated with telehealth. ResultsPrior to the pandemic, telehealth accounted for just 0.1% of monthly E&M visits but surged to 41.0% in April 2020 before stabilizing between 5.7% and 7.0% in 2023-2024. The average monthly E&M visit rate per 1,000 FFS beneficiaries was 906.8 pre-pandemic and 918.6 post-pandemic. In the post-pandemic period, telehealth comprised 1.2% of E&M visits in low-use specialties, 8.4% in medium-use specialties, and 43.8% in high-use specialties. Compared to the expected trend based on the low telehealth-use specialty, high and medium telehealth-use specialties experienced a 4.1% and 7.2% relative decline in overall E&M visits, respectively, in the post-pandemic period. ConclusionFollowing an initial surge, telehealth use stabilized in 2021 and beyond. Overall outpatient utilization remained stable post-pandemic, and increased telehealth adoption was not associated with a rise in total outpatient E&M visits. These findings suggest that broad telehealth adoption has not led to increased healthcare utilization among Medicare FFS beneficiaries.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 9%
19.0%
2
Health Policy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
3
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.1%
4
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.1%
5
BMC Health Services Research
51 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 39%
2.7%
7
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.7%
8
Medical Decision Making
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
9
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.2%
10
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
11
Journal of General Internal Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
12
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
13
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
14
BMJ
51 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
15
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
16
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
17
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
18
JMIR Formative Research
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
19
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.2%
20
Preventive Medicine Reports
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
21
JMIRx Med
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
22
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
23
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
24
British Journal of General Practice
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
25
Emerging Infectious Diseases
105 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
26
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
27
BMC Medical Education
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
28
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
29
BMJ Open Quality
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
30
Journal of Medical Economics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%