Back

Retrospective cohort analysis of antiretroviral therapy initiation timelines and clinical outcomes in adults with HIV and TB disease in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

Jansen van Vuuren, C. J.; van der Molen, J.; Sookrajh, Y.; Ngwenya, T.; Khubone, T.; Mkhize, S.; Asare, K.; Naidoo, K.; Lessells, R.; Lewis, L.; Garrett, N.; Dorward, J.

2025-03-06 hiv aids
10.1101/2025.03.05.25323306 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundWe aimed to determine antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation timing and outcomes in people living with HIV (PLHIV) receiving tuberculosis treatment in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. MethodsWe performed a retrospective cohort analysis of routinely collected de-identified data from 62 clinics including PLHIV not already receiving ART aged [&ge;]16 years, starting tuberculosis treatment between October 2016-November 2019. Multivariable Poisson regression models with robust standard errors evaluated associations between timing of ART initiation (after starting tuberculosis treatment) and successful tuberculosis treatment, and 6-month HIV viral load (VL) <50 copies/mL. ResultsAmong 5,548 PLHIV with tuberculosis, 29.8% initiated ART within 15 days ("early"), 36.2% in 16-56 days, 8.7% in 57-210 days, with 25.3% not initiating ART by 7 months. Proportions with successful tuberculosis treatment were similar comparing 16-56 and 57-210 days to early initiation, with a lower likelihood of successful tuberculosis outcome with no ART within 7 months (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 0.81 [0.77-0.86], p<0.001). In those with a known VL 6 months post-ART initiation (n=2,658), initiation within 57-210 days had a lower likelihood of viral suppression (aRR 0.90 [0.82-0.99], p<0.03). ConclusionAlthough <30% of PLHIV with tuberculosis initiated ART early, this was associated with better tuberculosis outcomes and VL suppression.

Published in International Journal of STD &amp; AIDS · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.