Investigating the effect of an online enhanced care program on the emotional and physical wellbeing of patients discharged from hospital with acute decompensated heart failure: Enhanced care program for heart failure
Kuhne, C.; Wetzler, H.; Fakes, K.; Oldmeadow, C.; Boyle, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe Enhanced HF Care study is a prospective randomised open blinded endpoint (PROBE) design trial comparing the effectiveness of a digital health intervention -Enhanced HF Care -- to usual care, in increasing health related quality of life for patients hospitalised with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). The study aims to evaluate effectiveness in (i) improving emotional and physical wellbeing, and (ii) decreasing healthcare utilisation. This statistical analysis plan outlines the pre-specified statistical principles and procedures for analysing data from the trial, which has been updated from as described in the trial protocol to reflect lower than anticipated recruitment rates. MethodsThe co-primary outcomes are emotional and physical wellbeing measured using the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) domains at 6-months post-recruitment. Secondary outcomes include MLHFQ emotional and physical well-being at 1-month post-recruitment, unplanned hospital readmissions, and emergency department presentations. Statisticians conducting analyses are blind to treatment allocation. AnalysisBayesian hierarchical mixed effects models will be used to estimate treatment effects for all outcomes, with uninformative prior distributions specified for effect parameter and half-Cauchy priors on the random effect standard deviation and the within person standard deviation. For each outcome, the analysis will present mean differences between treatment groups with 95% credible intervals (highest posterior density) and posterior probabilities of treatment effect. All randomised participants will be analysed according to their assigned treatment group following an intention-to-treat framework, excluding only those who withdraw consent for data use. Intercurrent events will be handled using the estimands framework. For MLHFQ outcomes, a composite strategy will be employed where participants who die will be assigned the maximum value reflecting worst possible quality of life. Healthcare utilisation outcomes (unplanned hospital readmissions and emergency department presentations) will be analysed using a while alive strategy, with follow-up extending until either death or 6 months post-randomisation, whichever occurs first. For handling missing data, we will use multiple imputation by chained equations (MICE) under a missing at random assumption when participants drop out. For completed MLHFQ subscales specifically, if only one item is missing within a subscale, we will use mean imputation for that item. However, if more than one item is missing form a subscale, the total score will be set to missing and MICE will be used to impute the total subscale score. Additional analyses will estimate the posterior predictive probability of trial success had the target sample size been achieved. ConclusionPublication of this statistical analysis plan prior to data analysis ensures transparency in the analytical approach and minimises potential bias in the interpretation and reporting of trial results, particularly given the adaptation to Bayesian methods necessitated by lower-than-expected recruitment. Statement of ComplianceThis document is a statistical analysis plan for the aforementioned clinical trial. This trial will be conducted in compliance with all stipulation of this approved protocol, the conditions of the ethics committee approval, the NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (2007), and the Note for Guidance on Good Clinical Practice (CPMP/ICH-135/95). O_TBL View this table: org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@543a51org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1c0bddcorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@f0cae7org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@993463org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@3e591f_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_TBL C_TBL 1. Administration informationTrial registration This trial was prospectively registered via the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry on the 4th October 2022 (Reference: ACTRN12622001289707).
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Real-world effects of ACE inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers: protocol for an emulation study of the ONTARGET trial using electronic health records 95%
- Face-to-face interventions to encourage enrolment in cardiac rehabilitation; a scoping review protocol 94%
- Apple Watch and Withings Evaluation of Symptoms, Treatment, and Rhythm in those Undergoing Cardioversion (AWE STRUCk): A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The IGNITE Trial: Participant Recruitment Lessons Prior to SARS-CoV-2 93%
- A Retrospective Analysis of Serious Adverse Events and Deaths in US-Based Lifestyle Clinical Trials for Cognitive Health 92%
- The Helping Older People Engage (HOPE) Study: Protocol & COVID Modifications for a Randomized Trial 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- STIMULATE-ICP: A pragmatic, multi-centre, cluster randomised trial of an integrated care pathway with a nested, Phase III, open label, adaptive platform randomised drug trial in individuals with Long COVID: a structured protocol 96%
- Investigating the use of a one-page infographic to improve recruitment and retention to the BASIL+ Randomised Controlled Trial: A Study Within a Trial (SWAT) 95%
- Analysis of clinical trial registry entry histories using the novel R package cthist 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Controlled evaLuation of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers for COVID-19 respIraTorY disease (CLARITY): Statistical analysis plan for a randomised controlled Bayesian adaptive sample size trial 97%
- Decision support system to evaluate VENTilation in the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (DeVENT study) – Trial Protocol 94%
- Development of a consensus extension of the estimands framework for cluster randomised trials (CRT-estimands): results from an international Delphi study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Use of digital technology tools to examine patient adherence to a prescription omega-3 polyunsaturated acids therapy intended to mitigate cardiovascular risk: protocol and preliminary demographic data from the DIAPAsOn prospective observational study 92%
- Scientific hypothesis generation process in clinical research: a secondary data analytic tool versus experience study protocol 92%
- The Womens Wellness After Giving Birth Program (WWAGBP) for Vietnamese women: A single-arm trial protocol 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.