Back

The diagnostic and prognostic utility of mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE)- a systematic review

Falconer, D.; Frojdh, F.; Brieger, D.; Kozor, R.; Ugander, M.

2025-03-05 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2025.03.05.25323051 medRxiv
Show abstract

Movement of the mitral annulus towards the left ventricular (LV) apex during systole, termed atrioventricular plane displacement (AVPD) or mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE), was first observed by Leonardo da Vinci in the 15th century. MAPSE, a measure of longitudinal movement, shows good agreement between transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), and can also be measured by transesophageal echocardiography and gated cardiac computed tomography. Manual measurement is fast, simple, and less reliant on good echocardiographic image quality than left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) or global longitudinal strain (GLS). Also, measurement can be easily automated, reducing reporting time. However, no major imaging guidelines advise routine measurement. We present a systematic review of studies appraising the diagnostic and prognostic performance of MAPSE from PubMed, Medline, Google Scholar and Embase until September 2025 in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Our findings demonstrate that MAPSE correlates with both LVEF (r=0.64 [95% confidence interval 0.54- 0.74]) and GLS (r=0.53 [0.45-0.63]), thus showing a modest association with measures of systolic function that may be particularly useful in patients with poor echocardiographic windows. Importantly, MAPSE falls while LVEF remains preserved across a range of pathologies, enabling earlier detection of systolic impairment than when using LVEF. MAPSE is also a powerful prognostic tool, outperforming both LVEF and GLS in predicting adverse events in several studies. Taken together, MAPSE has a clinically useful and important role that merits integration into routine cardiac imaging and care.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.