Back

Age Bias, Missing Data, and Declining Response Rates in the National Youth Risk Behavior Survey and Their Influence on Estimates of Trends in Adolescent Sexual Experience, 2011-2023

Santelli, J. J.; Malden, D. E.; Moss, R. A.; Finkelstein, M.; Lindberg, L. D.

2025-03-06 sexual and reproductive health
10.1101/2025.03.05.25323024 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionThe national Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS) has experienced considerable declines in response rates, increases in missing data on sexual experience, and shifts in data collection - all of which raise questions about bias in estimates for sexual experience among US high school students. MethodsWe used weighted data from the YRBS for 2011-2023 (n=110,409). We explored the impact of declining school and student response rates, missing data, and shifts in age distribution in 2021 on reported sexual intercourse. Using statistical decomposition, we estimated the percentage change in this outcome between 2019 and 2021 due to change in the age structure versus changes in reported behavior. ResultsFrom 2011 and 2023, school and student survey response rates declined (school 81% to 40%, student 87% to 71%, and overall, 71% to 35%). Missing data on ever had sex increased over time from 7.0% in 2011 to 29.5% in 2019 and 19.8% in 2023. The age structure in the YRBS national sample was similar from 2011-2019 and in 2023, but substantially younger in 2021. Statistical decomposition estimated that 50% of the change in sexual experience among adolescent women between 2019 and 2021 and 30% of the change for adolescent men was due to a change in the age distribution. ImplicationsDeclining response rates, increased missing data, and changes in the age structure of 2021 YRBS raise serious concerns about the validity of trends in the YRBS. A concerted national effort is needed to build support for the collection of YRBS and other public health surveillance data.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.6%
3
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
4
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.4%
5
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
7
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.0%
8
Epidemiology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
10
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
11
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 50%
2.1%
13
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
15
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
Sexually Transmitted Infections
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
17
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.1%
19
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
20
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
21
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
81 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
22
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Archives of Disease in Childhood
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
25
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
26
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.6%
28
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
29
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
30
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%