Back

Phase separation drives SNARE complexes formation

Chen, F.; Ke, Q.; Feng, S.; Chen, H.; Haung, Q.; Ma, F.; Cai, Y.; Chen, J.; Li, S.; Wei, W.; Sun, Y.; Peng, X.; Tong, L.; Sun, X.; Deng, L.; Wang, Y.; Cui, L.

2025-03-06 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.03.04.641570 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundNeuronal exocytosis is mainly driven by the assembly of the soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) complexes. However, little is known about the organization principle of the SNARE complex. MethodsProtein condensates formed by SNARE complex were imaged by confocal microscope. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) assay together with fusion and division assays at the cellular level and in vitro studies with purified proteins were performed to characterize the dynamic properties of protein condensates. The effect of SNARE complex phase separation on the recruitment of synaptic vesicles was detected by immunofluorescence. ResultsWe discover that phase separation drives SNARE complex formation and aggregation; in addition, nonintrinsically disordered regions (non-IDRs) of the syntaxin1 protein is necessary for the formation of these biological condensates. Functionally, phase separation of the SNARE complex can be regulated by the major cofactors of the fusion machinery and has the ability to recruit synaptic vesicles in neurons. ConclusionsOur study here establishes that phase separation is a promising way to mediate the formation and aggregation of the SNARE complex, and further identified that the non-IDRs of syntaxin1 is necessary for the phase separation of the SNARE complex. Our work answers an vital scientific question: does the SNARE complex function as multiple copies that are dispersed or clustered together to ensure sustained neurotransmitter release. In sum, phase separation provides an ideal working model for SNARE complex-mediated membrane fusion and neurotransmitter release.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.