Back

Causal Bayesian networks to quantify the interactions that influence implementation success

Schultz, A.; Chang, A. B.; McCallum, G. B.; Lau, G.; Toombs, M.; Barwick, M.; Laird, P.; Morris, P. S.; Norman, R.; Aitken, R.; Walker, R.; Mascaro, S.

2025-03-04 health systems and quality improvement
10.1101/2025.03.04.25323064 medRxiv
Show abstract

Despite the potential of evidence-based medical innovations to improve patient outcomes, their integration remains difficult. Implementation science aims to assist by identifying and deploying effective implementation strategies within complex health care settings. Determinant frameworks, such as the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), help identify factors influencing implementation success but do not specify mechanisms or methods for selecting optimal strategies. Selection methods are largely empirical, highlighting the need for objective, quantifiable approaches. We developed causal Bayesian networks (BNs) to model the interdependencies amongst contextual factors, determinants and outcomes with a specific example: the detection and management of chonic wet cough in Indigenous Australian children in primary health care settings. The BNs, informed by CFIR domains and prior qualitative research, quantifies the impact of barriers and enablers on implementation outcomes. The BNs enable predictions of intervention effects, and the assessment and quantification of potential implementation strategies, or a combination of strategies. The BNs are linked to a simple survey that allows implementation strategies to be tailored for each setting and that was administered at several sites across Australia to validate the models. The overall process, including the BNs and surveys, constitutes a generalisable structured workflow for selecting the most promising strategies. We describe the model development and validation, and the broader applicability of our BN-based workflow in implementation science.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 8%
19.4%
2
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.2%
3
Medical Decision Making
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
6
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.8%
7
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
8
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.2%
9
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
10
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.2%
11
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
12
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
Biometrics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
14
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
15
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.4%
16
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 65%
1.3%
18
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
19
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
20
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
22
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
23
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
24
CMAJ Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
25
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
26
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
27
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
28
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
BMC Research Notes
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
30
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%