Light-induced reversible assembly and actuation in ultrafast Ca2+-driven chemomechanical protein networks
Lei, X.; Floyd, C.; Ferrer, L. C.; Chakrabortty, T.; Chandrasekharan, N.; Dinner, A.; Coyle, S. M.; Honts, J.; Bhamla, S.
Show abstract
Programming rapid, repeatable motions in soft materials has remained a challenge in active matter and biomimetic design. Here, we present a light-controlled chemomechanical network based on Tetrahymena thermophila calcium-binding protein 2 (Tcb2), a Ca2+-sensitive contractile protein. These networks--driven by Ca2+-triggered structural rearrangements--exhibit dynamic selfassembly, spatiotemporal growth, and contraction rates comparable to actomyosin systems. By coupling light-sensitive chelators for optically triggered Ca2+ release, we achieve precise growth and repeatable mechanical contractility of Tcb2 networks, revealing emergent phenomena such as boundary-localized active regions and density gradient-driven reversals in motion. A coupled reaction-diffusion and elastic model explains these dynamics, highlighting the interplay between chemical network assembly and mechanical response. We further demonstrate active transport of particles via network-mediated forces in vitro and implement reinforcement learning to program seconds-scale spatiotemporal actuation in silico. These results establish a platform for designing responsive active materials with rapid chemomechanical dynamics and tunable optical control, with applications in synthetic cells, sub-cellular force generation, and programmable biomaterials.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Embryo mechanics cartography: inference of 3D force atlases from fluorescence microscopy 96%
- Jaxley: Differentiable simulation enables large-scale training of detailed biophysical models of neural dynamics 96%
- Temporal analysis of relative distances (TARDIS) is a robust, parameter-free alternative to single-particletracking 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.