Back

Neural representation of action symbols in primate frontal cortex

Tian, L. Y.; Garzon, K. U.; Rouse, A. G.; Eldridge, M. A.; Schieber, M. H.; Wang, X.-J.; Tenenbaum, J. B.; Freiwald, W. A.

2025-03-04 neuroscience Community evaluation
10.1101/2025.03.03.641276 bioRxiv
Show abstract

A hallmark of intelligence is proficiency in solving new problems, including those that differ dramatically from problems seen before. Problem-solving, in turn, depends on goal-directed generation of novel ideas and behaviors1, which has been proposed to rely on internal representations of discrete units, or symbols, and processes that recombine these units into a large set of possible composite representations1-9. Although this view has been influential in formulating cognitive-level explanations of behavior, definitive evidence for a neuronal substrate of symbols has remained elusive. Here, we identify a neural population encoding action symbols--recombinable representations of discrete units of motor behavior--localized to a specific area of frontal cortex. In macaque monkeys performing a drawing-like task, we found behavioral evidence that action elements (strokes) exhibit three critical features indicating an underlying symbolic representation: (i) invariance over low-level motor parameters; (ii) categorical structure, reflecting discrete types of action; and (iii) recombination into novel sequences. In simultaneous neural recordings across motor, premotor, and prefrontal cortex, we found that planning-related population activity in ventral premotor cortex (PMv) encodes actions in a manner that, like behavior, reflects motor invariance, categorical structure, and recombination. Activity in no other recorded area exhibited these three properties of symbols. These findings reveal a neural representation of action symbols localized to PMv, and therefore identify a putative neural substrate for symbolic cognitive operations.

Published in Nature (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.