Back

Socioeconomic Segregation and Park Greenness: Insights Across a Strong Latitudinal Gradient

Calbucheo, D.; Samaniego, H.

2025-03-11 ecology
10.1101/2025.03.03.640840 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Green Urban Areas (GUAs) in urban environments offer numerous benefits, including temperature regulation, air pollution reduction, climate event mitigation, and mental health improvement. Consequently, various organi zations worldwide emphasize the importance of equitable access to quality public green infrastructure to enhance urban quality of life. Despite these efforts, global trends indicate an unequal spatial distribution of greenness and GUAs, often favoring more affluent populations. In Chile, green infrastructure availability is similarly uneven, with greener GUAs typically found in higher socioeconomic neighborhoods. Our review of the evidence reveals that this inequity exists not only between cities with different investment capacities but also within the same administrations. However, most studies focus on the Metropolitan Region and primarily consider exposure and access to greenness. This study examines the greenness of GUAs in six Chilean conurbations, spanning a wide latitudinal gradient from Antofagasta to Puerto Montt, and compares it with socio-material segregation indicators. We calculated the mean NDVI of each green area using remote sensing data from Landsat 8. Socio-material characterization was conducted in two ways: stratifying the environment of each park using a socio-material index (ISMT) and analyzing the socioeconomic segregation of park visitors throughout the day using eXtended Call Detail Registries (XDR) from anonymized users of a major mobile telephone company (Movistar). Our findings indicate segregation in both dimensions, with greenness inequitably distributed among different ISMT categories. Additionally, the socio-material entropy of park visitors aligns with literature trends, showing higher segregation during times when people are at home and in more peripheral and socioeconomically vulnerable areas. We discuss the need for more granular and scaled analyses and highlight the studys relevance in addressing statistical issues such as the Modifiable Areal Unit Problem (MAUP).

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 12%
15.3%
2
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
15.3%
3
Sustainability
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.2%
4
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 18%
5.2%
7
Landscape Ecology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
8
Journal of Environmental Management
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
9
Environmental Pollution
37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
10
Ecological Indicators
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
11
Biological Conservation
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
12
Ecological Applications
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
13
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
14
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Environmental Research Letters
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
16
Environment International
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
17
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.9%
19
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
27 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
20
FACETS
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
21
Conservation Science and Practice
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
22
Remote Sensing
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%