Back

Piping Plover Home Ranges Do Not Appear to be Impacted by Restoration of Barrier Islands and Headlands

Zenzal, T. J.; Anderson, A. N.; LeBlanc, D.; Dobbs, R. C.; Geary, B.; Waddle, J. H.

2025-03-03 zoology
10.1101/2025.03.03.638931 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Restoration of barrier island and headland habitats can alter existing and create new habitats, which may impact wildlife occupying these areas such as the threatened Piping Plover (Charadrius melodus). We used resight data from banded birds to develop minimum convex polygon (MCP) and kernel density estimates (KDE) of individual Piping Plover home ranges to investigate whether changes in habitat use resulted from restoration activities at Whiskey Island and Caminada Headland, Louisiana. We quantified home range areas for each season and compared changes among pre-restoration, active restoration, and post-restoration phases at each site. We had sufficient sample sizes from Whiskey Island to compare home ranges derived by MCP during the pre-restoration phase to the active restoration phase. However, we did not have enough resight data to analyze post-restoration phase by MCP or any phase by KDE at Whiskey Island. For Caminada Headland, we were able to compare all phases of restoration using MCP, but only had sufficient data to compare pre-restoration and active restoration phases using KDE. Aside from one significant decrease in core (50% isopleth) home range at Caminada Headland when comparing MCPs between post-restoration ([~]8 ha) and pre-restoration ([~]11 ha) phases, we found no other differences in home range size across phases at either of our study sites. The sum of all evidence generally indicating no change to Piping Plover home range size suggests that barrier island and headland restoration did not have significant positive or negative impacts. The weak response to restoration activities further suggests that birds are using similar or smaller amounts of habitat after restoration is complete and may not need to expand their foraging range following restoration. Further study can help to understand how species of conservation concern respond to coastal restoration efforts, which is critical for establishing comprehensive conservation strategies aimed at species recovery.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.7%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 19%
9.8%
3
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.8%
4
Biological Invasions
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
5
Conservation Science and Practice
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
Marine Ecology Progress Series
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
7
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
8
Landscape Ecology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
9
Biological Conservation
46 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
10
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
Animal Conservation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
12
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
13
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
14
Journal of Fish Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
Developmental Biology
150 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
17
Coral Reefs
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
18
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
19
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
20
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
21
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
22
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
23
Biotropica
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
24
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 65%
1.1%
25
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
26
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
27
Journal of Biogeography
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
28
Zootaxa
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
29
Journal of Thermal Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
30
FACETS
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%