Pandemic-risk-related behaviour change in England from June 2020 to March 2022: REACT-1 study among over 2 million people
Steyn, N.; Chadeau-Hyam, M.; Whitaker, M.; Atchison, C. J.; Ashby, D.; Cooke, G.; Ward, H.; Elliott, P.; Donnelly, C. A.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo determine how people in England changed their infection risk-related behaviours during the COVID-19 pandemic and in response to control measures, 19 June 2020 to 31 March 2022. DesignOver 18 (of 19) rounds, randomly selected participants across England completed a questionnaire about risk-related behaviours, socio-demographics, and symptoms. ParticipantsBetween 85,018 and 154,060 randomly selected participants per round, aged 5+ years, totalling 2,177,657 responses with relevant data. Main outcome measuresPrimary outcomes were self-reported shielding and/or taking specific precautions, not leaving home in the prior week, not being in close proximity with anyone outside their household the day before, and wearing face coverings outside the home. Secondary community-level measures of mobility and public health policy stringency were compared to the primary outcomes to provide population-level context to the observed findings. ResultsInfection risk-related behaviours varied considerably over the nearly two years under study. Protective behaviours peaked in January 2021, during Englands winter wave, before widespread vaccination. At that time, the estimated proportion of self-reported shielding and/or taking specific precautions reached 21.6% (95% confidence interval 21.4% to 21.8%), of self-reported not leaving home in the week prior to completing the questionnaire reached 7.99% (7.85% to 8.13%) and of self-reported not having contact with anyone outside their household on the day before answering the questionnaire reached 89.2% (89.1% to 89.4%). As self-reported vaccination rates increased and prevalence of infection decreased, protective behaviours decreased, although patterns varied by demographics. Protective behaviours were strongly correlated with community-level mobility data and the stringency of public health measures. ConclusionsIndividual-based data showed sizeable proportions of people undertook protective behaviours during the pandemic especially during the second lockdown in January 2021 although there was evidence of "pandemic fatigue" in the studys later stages. Self-reported behaviours were closely aligned with community mobility data and the stringency of government policies, indicating policy-driven behaviour changes.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Time varying association between deprivation, ethnicity and SARS-CoV-2 infections in England: a space-time study 94%
- The Omicron SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in England during February 2022 93%
- Evaluating social and spatial inequalities of large scale rapid lateral flow SARS-CoV-2 antigen testing in COVID-19 management: An observational study of Liverpool, UK (November 2020 to January 2021) 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deprivation and Exposure to Public Activities during the COVID-19 Pandemic in England and Wales 95%
- SARS-CoV-2 infections in migrants and the role of household overcrowding: A causal mediation analysis of Virus Watch data 94%
- Do people reduce compliance with COVID-19 guidelines following vaccination? A longitudinal analysis of matched UK adults 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Social Contact Patterns and Implications for Infectious Disease Transmission: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Contact Surveys 94%
- Association of close-range contact patterns with SARS-CoV-2: a household transmission study 93%
- Genomic epidemiology of COVID-19 in care homes in the East of England 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 mass testing in adult social care in England 93%
- The burden of SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Severe Illness in South Africa March 2020-August 2022: A synthesis of epidemiological data 90%
- Factors associated with effectiveness of interventions to prevent obesity in children: a synthesis of evidence from 204 randomized trials 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.