Time to cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging influences diagnostic yield in patients with suspected myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries: a meta-analysis
Eslick, G. D.; Eslick, E. M.; Ugander, M.; Kozor, R.
Show abstract
ObjectivesTo conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the evidence of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in patients with suspected myocardial infarction and nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA), and how time to CMR influences diagnosis. BackgroundCMR is indicated in patients with suspected MINCOA but it is unclear when is best to perform the CMR and how this timing can influence diagnosis. MethodsWe systematically conducted a comprehensive literature search to identify relevant studies. These studies were assessed to determine the study quality and analysis was performed using a Random-effects model. ResultsThere were 23 eligible studies, including 4,231 patients. The mean quality score was 9.35 out of 10. For MINOCA patients assessed by CMR, the average median time from presentation to CMR was 12.50 days (SD: 14 days, range 0-365 days). The pooled frequencies of the most common diagnoses were: myocarditis (29%), myocardial infarction (22%), Takotsubo syndrome (10%), cardiomyopathy (7%), and 22% had no cardiac diagnosis (normal CMR findings). In pooled analysis, the prevalence of normal CMR findings increased by three percentage points for each extra day of waiting between presentation and CMR scanning over the studied range of 0-14 days (Slope: 3.1 %-points/day; r=0.67, p=0.003). ConclusionsIn patients with suspected MINOCA, the longer it takes a patient to have a CMR scan, the more likely the results will be normal and no diagnosis made by CMR. CMR should be performed as early as possible in suspected MINOCA. HighlightsO_LIIn patients with suspected MINOCA, the pooled frequency of diagnoses made by CMR include myocarditis (29%), myocardial infarction (22%), Takotsubo syndrome (10%), cardiomyopathy (7%), and no diagnosis/normal study (22%). C_LIO_LIThe longer it takes to have a CMR scan the more likely the patient will have a normal scan. C_LIO_LIIn patients with suspected MINOCA, CMR scanning should be performed as soon as possible. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Relationship of mild to moderate impairment of left ventricular ejection fraction with fatal ventricular arrhythmic events in cardiac sarcoidosis 94%
- Assessment of cardiovascular & pulmonary pathobiology in vivo during acute COVID-19 93%
- Right Heart Remodeling After Pulmonary Valve Replacement in Patients with Pulmonary Atresia or Critical Stenosis with Intact Ventricular Septum 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Investigating Electrocardiographic Abnormalities in Patients with Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction 96%
- Prognostic value of compact myocardial thinning in patients with left ventricular non-compaction 95%
- Higher mortality in male patients with Takotsubo cardiomyopathy appears to be related to higher complication rates 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictors and outcomes of Cardiac Dyssynchrony among patients with heart failure attending Benjamin Mkapa Hospital in Dodoma, central Tanzania: A protocol of prospective-longitudinal study 94%
- Predicting factors for long-term survival in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest - a propensity score-matched analysis 94%
- Effects of low versus high inspired oxygen fraction on myocardial injury after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A randomized clinical trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of troponin and natriuretic peptides in takotsubo syndrome and acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis 94%
- Vascular Comorbidities Worsen Prognosis of Patients with Heart Failure Hospitalized with COVID-19 93%
- Machine learning approaches to predict 30-day mortality following percutaneous coronary intervention in an Australian population 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.