New Gain-of-Function Mutations Prioritize Mechanisms of HER2 Activation
Giacoletto, C. J.; Valente, L. J.; Brown, L.; Patterson, S.; Gokhale, R.; Mockus, S. M.; Grody, W. W.; Deng, H.-W.; Rotter, J. I.; Schiller, M.
Show abstract
ERBB2 (HER2) is a well-studied oncogene with several driver mutations apart from the well-known amplification defect in some breast cancers. We used the GigaAssay to test the functional effect of HER2 missense mutations on its receptor tyrosine kinase function. The GigaAssay is a modular high-throughput one-pot assay system for simultaneously measuring molecular function of thousands of genetic variants at very high accuracy. The activities of 5,886 mutations were classified, significantly more than mutants previously reported. These variants include 112 new in vitro, 10 known, and 9 new in vivo gain-of-function (GOF) mutations. Many of the GOFs spatially cluster in sequence and structure, supporting the activation mechanisms of heterodimerization with EGFR and release of kinase inhibition by the juxtamembrane domain. Retrospective analysis of patient outcomes from the Genomic Data Commons predicts increased survival with the newly identified HER2 GOF variants. Author statementChristopher J. Giacoletto: Computational methodology, Software, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing - Original Draft, Writing - Review and Editing, Visualization; Liz Valente: Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing - Original Draft, Writing - Review and Editing, Visualization; Lancer Brown: Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing - Original Draft, Writing - Review and Editing, Visualization; Sara Patterson; Writing - Review and Editing; Rewatee Gokhale; Writing - Review and Editing; Susan Mockus: Writing - Review and Editing; Wayne Grody Writing - Review and Editing; Hong Wen Deng: Writing - Review and Editing; Writing - Review and Editing; Jerome I. Rotter: Writing - Review and Editing; Martin R. Schiller: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, Resources, Data Curation, Writing - Original Draft, Writing - Review and Editing, Visualization, Supervision, Project Administration, Funding acquisition. The experimental and bioinformatic investigation was performed at Heligenics.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Homogeneous SIRPα-CD47 Cell-Based, Ligand-Binding Assay: Utility for Small Molecule Drug Development in Immuno-oncology. 93%
- Autocrine Signaling by Receptor Tyrosine Kinases in Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder 92%
- Development of an orally-administrable tumor vasculature-targeting therapeutic using annexin A1-binding D-peptides 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multiscale Analysis And Validation Of Effective Drug Combinations Targeting Driver Kras Mutations In Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer 93%
- Targeting the Src pathway enhances the efficacy of selective FGFR inhibitors in cancers with FGFR3 alterations 92%
- Immunohistochemical Profiling of Histone Modification Biomarkers Identifies Subtype-Specific Epigenetic Signatures and Potential Drug Targets in Breast Cancer 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Analytical validation and clinical utilization of K-4CARE TM : a comprehensive genomic profiling assay with personalized MRD detection 92%
- The Okur-Chung Neurodevelopmental Syndrome (OCNDS) mutation CK2K198R leads to a rewiring of kinase specificity 90%
- Quantum Chemical Profiling of Protein Mutations via Fragment-Based DFT 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of N361 Glycosylation on Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Biological Function 93%
- Hormone Receptor-status Prediction in Breast Cancer Using Gene Expression Profiles and Their Macroscopic Landscape 92%
- HIF-dependent expression of creatine kinase brain isoform (CKB) promotes breast cancer metastasis, whereas cyclocreatine therapy impairs invasion and improves the efficacy of conventional chemotherapies 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.