Bayesian Aggregation of Multiple Annotations Enhances Rare Variant Association Testing
Nappi, A.; Cai, N.; Casale, F. P.
Show abstract
Gene-level rare variant association tests (RVATs) are essential for uncovering disease mechanisms and identifying potential drug targets. Advances in sequence-based machine learning have expanded the availability of variant pathogenicity scores, offering new opportunities to improve variant prioritization for RVATs. However, existing methods often rely on rigid models or analyze single annotations in isolation, limiting their ability to leverage these advances. To address this, we introduce BayesRVAT, a Bayesian framework for RVATs that models variant effects using multiple annotations. By specifying priors on variant effects and estimating gene-trait-specific burden scores through variational inference, BayesRVAT flexibly accommodates diverse genetic architectures. In simulations, BayesRVAT improved power while maintaining statistical calibration. When applied to real data from the UK Biobank, BayesRVAT detected 10.2% more associations with blood traits than the next-best method and uncovered novel gene-disease associations in analyses of eight disease traits, including a link between PRPH2 and retinal disease. These results highlight BayesRVATs potential to enhance rare variant discovery and improve gene-trait association studies.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Optimizing and benchmarking polygenic risk scores with GWAS summary statistics 96%
- Vireo: Bayesian demultiplexing of pooled single-cell RNA-seq data without genotype reference 96%
- Primo: integration of multiple GWAS and omics QTL summary statistics for elucidation of molecular mechanisms of trait-associated SNPs and detection of pleiotropy in complex traits 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Fast and flexible joint fine-mapping of multiple traits via the Sum of Single Effects model 97%
- Mendelian randomization accounting for correlated and uncorrelated pleiotropic effects using genome-wide summary statistics. 96%
- Set-based rare variant association tests for biobank scale sequencing data sets 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.