Back

Steering in the presence of a gaze-contingent occlusion over a quarter of the visual field

Giguere, A. P.; Cavanaugh, M. R.; Huxlin, K. R.; Tadin, D.; Fajen, B. R.; Diaz, G. J.

2025-03-07 animal behavior and cognition
10.1101/2025.03.02.641038 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Why do some cortically blind (CB) drivers who are missing vision from a quadrant or hemifield have trouble maintaining a central lane position, while others do not? A recent driving study in virtual reality showed that most patients with right-sided visual field deficits (right CB) perform similarly to controls, while most of those with left CB demonstrated a unique pattern of steering biases (Giguere et al., 2025). In this study, we tested the hypothesis that these biases could result from loss of visual information falling on the blind field. The steering and gaze behavior of 24 subjects with normal vision (mean age: 19.8 years, SD: 1.44) were recorded in a virtual reality steering task while gaze-contingent occluding masks were imposed on a quadrant of their visual field. The central five degrees of vision were spared to mimic the sparing present in most CB patients. Turn direction (left/right), turn radius (two non-constant radii), and occlusion quadrant (one of four quadrants or no occlusion) were randomized between trials. We found that the pattern of steering biases observed in CB drivers were not replicated when visually-healthy drivers were subjected to gaze-contingent masks, and we conclude that it may be a mistake to characterize the effects of cortical blindness on steering behavior as consistent with a simple omission of visual information. This insight has the potential to guide future research on CB adaptation to their visual impairments and possible interventions to improve their steering performance.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Vision
92 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.7%
2
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.9%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 7%
9.8%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.6%
5
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
7
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.6%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 33%
2.5%
9
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.4%
10
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
11
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.0%
12
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.8%
13
Human Movement Science
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
14
Vision Research
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
16
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.3%
17
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
18
Neurobiology of Aging
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
19
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
20
Current Research in Neurobiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
21
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.7%
22
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
23
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
24
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 48%
0.6%