Designing optimal perturbation inputs for system identification in neuroscience
Ogino, M.; Sekizawa, D.; Kitazono, J.; Oizumi, M.
Show abstract
AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWInvestigating the dynamics of neural networks, which are governed by connectivity between neurons, is a fundamental challenge in neuroscience. Because passive (spontaneous) activity provides only limited information for estimating connectivity, perturbation-based approaches are widely applied in neuroscience, as they can evoke underlying hidden dynamics. However, the characteristics of such perturbations have typically been designed based on empirical or biological intuition. To enable more accurate estimation of connectivity, we propose a data-driven and theoretically grounded framework for optimally designing perturbation inputs, based on formulating the neural model as a control system. The core theoretical insight underlying our approach is that neural signals observed in the passive state lack sufficient latent information, which leads to failures in the system identification. Perturbations reveal these hidden dynamics and lead to improved estimation. Guided by these insights, we derive a theoretical basis for optimizing perturbation inputs that minimize estimation errors in neural system identification. Building upon this, we further explore the relationship of this theory with stimulation patterns commonly used in neuroscience, such as frequency, impulse, and step inputs. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this framework for neuroscience through simulations grounded in experimental paradigms such as neural state classification and optimal control of neural states. Our theoretical analysis, together with multiple simulations, consistently shows that perturbations designed according to our framework achieve substantially more accurate system identification compared to the conventional, intuition-based inputs. This study provides a theoretical foundation for designing perturbation inputs to achieve accurate estimation of neural dynamics. This, in turn, enables reliable discrimination of neural states such as levels of consciousness and pathological conditions, and facilitates precise control of their transitions toward recovery from abnormal states.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Reduced Dimension, Biophysical Neuron Models Constructed From Observed Data 95%
- Performance Limitations in Sensorimotor Control: Tradeoffs between Neural Computation and Accuracy in Tracking Fast Movements 95%
- A mean-field to capture asynchronous irregular dynamics of conductance-based networks of adaptive quadratic integrate-and-fire neuron models 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multitaper estimates of phase-amplitude coupling 94%
- How to entrain a selected neuronal rhythm but not others: open-loop dithered brain stimulation for selective entrainment 94%
- A formalism for sequential estimation of neural membrane time constant and input-output curve towards selective and closed-loop transcranial magnetic stimulation 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.