Back

Mustard-DB: The Database of Cellular, Molecular, and Phenotypic Data in Sulphur Mustard Exposure

Ahmadi, A.; Rafiei, F.; Alizadeh, M.; Chitsaz, A.; Ghasemi, S.; Bagheri, H.; Ghazvini, A.; Arabfard, M.; Azimzadeh, S.; Ghanei, M.

2025-03-05 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.03.02.639327 bioRxiv
Show abstract

1The significance of sulfur mustard as a chemical hazard cannot be overstated. Its potential for causing severe morbidity and long-term health issues makes understanding its effects crucial. Mustard-DB is an essential database that consolidates extensive cellular, molecular, and clinical data on sulfur mustard exposure. It stands as a critical tool for the scientific community, shedding light on the pathophysiological mechanisms and potential therapeutic interventions for those affected by this noxious agent. The database provides a detailed account of the acute and chronic cellular responses, and clinical outcomes associated with sulfur mustard in in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo studies. By offering a multidimensional view of the data, Mustard-DB enables a comprehensive understanding of the agents impact on human health. This manuscript presents the development, structure, and application of Mustard-DB (www.Mustard-DB.com), emphasizing its role in enhancing our response to chemical threats and improving patient outcomes.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 3%
34.9%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Database
◐ 61 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
Similar papers in this journal
3
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
○ 128 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Antioxidants
○ 25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
5
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
● 242 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
Similar papers in this journal
6
BMC Research Notes
○ 33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
7
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 39%
2.5%
8
Scientific Data
○ 209 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
9
Genes
○ 144 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
10
Metabolites
○ 53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
11
Frontiers in Pharmacology
○ 111 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
12
PeerJ
◐ 308 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.6%
13
Chemical Research in Toxicology
● 10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
14
GigaScience
◐ 212 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
15
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
○ 10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
16
Molecules
○ 39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
17
Journal of Hazardous Materials
○ 21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
18
Bioinformatics
◐ 1204 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
19
Heliyon
○ 152 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
20
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
○ 98 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Computers in Biology and Medicine
○ 128 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
○ 32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
23
Frontiers in Immunology
○ 638 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.5%
24
RSC Advances
● 22 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
25
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
○ 494 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.5%
26
Briefings in Bioinformatics
◐ 354 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
27
SoftwareX
○ 15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
28
Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology
○ 14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
29
Chemosphere
○ 17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
30
BMC Bioinformatics
○ 457 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.