Effect of Gene-based vs. Standard Weight-Loss Recommendations on Anthropometry, Lipid and Glucose Markers, and Dietary Intake: The MyGeneMyDiet Study
Nacis, J. S.; Labrador, J. P. H.; Ronquillo, D. G. D.; Rementilla, J. C.; Rodriguez, M. P.; Madrid, M. L.; Frane, R. D.; Santos, N. L. C.; Dablo, A. M. F. D.; Carrillo, J. J. V.; Fernandez, M. G.; Fanio, D. J. V.; Martirez, D. A. S.; Paller, M. V.; Monje, H. S. S.; Cabigan, R. M. V.; Bausas, A. A.; Agra, G. M.; Bunhiyan, R. C.; van Duijnhoven, F. J. B.; Gonzales, G. B.
Show abstract
BackgroundGene-based nutrition recommendations have emerged as a strategy for weight management, but their effectiveness over standard advice remains uncertain. ObjectiveThis study evaluated MyGeneMyDiet(R) recommendations versus standard advice on anthropometry, biochemical markers, and dietary intake in overweight and obese Filipino adults over 12 months. MethodsIn this 12-month randomized controlled trial, participants received either MyGeneMyDiet(R) or standard advice. Both groups underwent regular nutrition counseling during the active phase (months 0-6) before transitioning to free-living conditions (months 6-12). Primary outcomes included weight, BMI, waist circumference, and body fat percentage; secondary outcomes were dietary intake and biochemical markers. Analyses followed an intention-to-treat approach, with paired t-tests for within-group comparisons and ANCOVA for between-group differences. Sensitivity analyses used Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) and Inverse Probability of Attrition Weighting (IPAW) to address loss-to-follow-up. ResultsOf 136 screened, 52 participants (19-59 years) were enrolled (MyGeneMyDiet(R), n = 29; standard recommendation, n = 23), with 27 completing the study (MyGeneMyDiet(R), n = 15; standard recommendation, n = 12). Weight changes over 12 months were minimal, with no substantial differences between groups. At month 6, baseline-adjusted analyses showed no meaningful differences in weight (-0.36 kg [95% CI: -1.77, 1.04]), BMI (0.11 kg/m{superscript 2} [-0.51, 0.73]), waist circumference (-0.27 cm [-2.23, 1.69]), or body fat percentage (0.92% [-0.86, 1.05]). These trends persisted on month 12. While both groups reduced dietary intake, the MyGeneMyDiet(R) group showed greater decreases in total calories (-461 kcal, P = 0.001), protein (-12 g, P = 0.007), carbohydrates (-46 g, P = 0.015), and fat (-22 g, P = 0.014), though between-group differences remained modest. ConclusionsGene-based and standard weight management advice led to comparable weight and metabolic outcomes over 12 months. While gene-based recommendations influenced dietary intake, these changes did not improve anthropometric or biochemical outcomes. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT05098899.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Dietaryindex: A User-Friendly and Versatile R Package for Standardizing Dietary Pattern Analysis in Epidemiological and Clinical Studies 94%
- Monitoring Body Composition Change for Intervention Studies with Advancing 3D Optical Imaging Technology in Comparison to Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry 94%
- Diet and physical activity during the COVID-19 lockdown period (March-May 2020): results from the French NutriNet-Sante cohort study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The effects of time-restricted eating vs. standard dietary advice on weight, metabolic health and the consumption of processed food: A pragmatic randomised controlled trial in community-based adults 96%
- Almond Consumption Improves Inflammatory Profiles Independent of Weight Change: A 6-Week Randomized Controlled Trial in Adults with Obesity 96%
- Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on weight and BMI among UK adults: a longitudinal analysis of data from the HEBECO study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A feasibility study to test a novel approach to dietary weight loss with a focus on assisting informed decision making in food selection 97%
- Eating Disorders In weight-related Therapy (EDIT): Protocol for a systematic review with individual participant data meta-analysis of eating disorder risk in behavioural weight management 95%
- Optimization of nutritional strategies using a mechanistic computational model in prediabetes: Application to the J-DOIT1 study data 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on diet behaviour among UK adults: a longitudinal analysis of the HEBECO study 95%
- The Charitable Feeding System helps Food Insecure Participants maintain Fruit and Vegetable intake during COVID-19 92%
- The Biochemical Effects of Carotenoids in Orange Carrots on the Colonic Proteome in a Mouse Model of Diet-induced Obesity 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Knowledge and beliefs about dietary inorganic nitrate in a representative sample of adults from the United Kingdom 94%
- Childhood body composition and BMI as a predictor of cardiometabolic non-communicable diseases in adulthood: A systematic review 93%
- Demographic, spatial, and temporal dietary intake patterns among 526,774 23andMe research participants 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.