Back

Tie2-Dependent Mechanisms Promote Leptomeningeal Collateral Remodeling and Reperfusion Following Stroke

Kaloss, A.; de Jager, C.; Lyles, K.; Groot, N.; Zhu, Y.; Lin, Y.; Xie, H.; Matson, J.; Theus, M.

2025-03-06 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.02.28.640890 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Leptomeningeal collaterals are distal pial arterial anastomotic vessels that provide an alternative route for redistributing cerebral blood flow following arterial obstruction, thereby limiting tissue damage. However, the regulatory mechanisms and strategies to enhance this adaptive response remain under investigation. This study explored the pharmacological effects of Tie2 receptor activation, using the peptide agonist Vasculotide, following permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion (pMCAO). Vasculotide improved collateral growth and remodeling, which correlated with reduced infarct volume, enhanced blood flow, and functional recovery within 24hrs post-pMCAO. In contrast, collateral growth was attenuated in Tie2 and EphA4/Tie2 double knockdown mice, while the loss of EphA4 increased Tie2 and Ang-1 expression and mimicked the positive effects of Vasculotide following stroke. Furthermore, bulk RNA sequencing of meningeal tissue identified key transcriptomic changes, including alterations in AJ-associated transcripts, such as Krt5, Krt14, and Col17a1, in the ipsilateral meninges of both endothelial cell-specific EphA4 knockout and Vasculotide-treated mice. Krt5 expression was found upregulated on meningeal arterial vascular network in injured KO mice, highlighting a potential new mediator of meningeal vascular remodeling. These findings illustrate that EphA4 and Tie2 play opposing roles in collateral remodeling, including the regulation of Krt5. Modulating their activity could potentially enhance the collateral response to stroke.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.