Back

Behavioural and neurogenetic evidence for emotion primitives in the fruit fly Drosophila: insights from the Open Field Test

Lueningschroer-Wang, Y.; Derksen, E.; Steigmeier, M.; Wegener, C.

2025-03-02 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.02.28.640745 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Emotions, defined as transient states preparing organisms for adaptive responses, are thought to be based on evolutionarily conserved building blocks ("emotion primitives") that are present across mammalian and other vertebrate species. Whether and to which extent these building blocks are found in insects is largely undefined. In this study, we employ the open field test in fruit flies and focus on wall-following and total walking activity as behavioural indicators of emotion-like states. Wildtype and transgenic flies were subjected to various conditions, including social isolation, starvation, and exposure to anxiolytic substances prior to behavioural testing in the open field test. The results indicate that wall-following and total walking activity are modulated by these conditions, with generally increased wall-following observed under aversive stimuli and decreased values under positive conditions. Notably, the behaviour was consistent across different times of the day and independent of circadian rhythms. Genetic manipulation of neuromodulatory systems, such as serotonin, dopamine, and neuropeptide F, supports the role of these pathways in modulating emotion-like states in the fruit fly. Activation of reward-related neurons decreased wall-following, while inhibition increased it, aligning with known effects in mammalian models. Additionally, pharmacological treatments with ethanol and diazepam produced predictable changes in wall-following and total walking activity, reinforcing the validity of the open field test as a measure of emotion-like states in the fly. The findings suggest that Drosophila exhibits core emotion-like states, with wall-following and total walking activity serving as reliable indicators of emotional valence and arousal. Our results promote the use of Drosophila as a powerful genetic model to dissect the neuronal and neurochemical substrates of emotion primitives, shedding light on the evolution of basic emotional processing mechanisms.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.4%
2
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 12%
8.8%
3
Journal of Experimental Biology
259 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
7.8%
4
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.5%
5
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.2%
7
Journal of Insect Physiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
8
Journal of Neurogenetics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
9
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.9%
10
Open Biology
106 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
11
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
12
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
13
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
14
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
15
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.1%
16
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
17
Journal of Biological Rhythms
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
18
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.0%
19
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.0%
20
Learning & Memory
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
21
Journal of Comparative Physiology A
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
22
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
23
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
24
Insects
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
27
BMC Ecology and Evolution
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
29
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%