Psychosocial Impact on Parents of Children with Strabismus: A Study of Demographic and Clinical Correlates
Ding, J.; Wang, W.; Zhang, W.; Li, Y.
Show abstract
PurposeThis study aimed to explore the psychosocial challenges experienced by parents of children with strabismus and to identify demographic and clinical factors associated with these challenges. MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted involving 220 parents of children diagnosed with strabismus. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the children were collected and analyzed. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Zung Self-Rating Anxiety/Depression Scale (SAS/SDS) were administered to assess parental anxiety and depression levels. ResultsSignificant differences in anxiety and depression levels were observed between the HADS and SAS/SDS assessments. Specifically, the prevalence of anxiety was higher using HADS-A compared to SAS (21.82% vs. 12.73%, P = 0.012), while depression rates were higher using SDS compared to HADS-D (31.82% vs. 16.82%, P < 0.001). HADS-D scores were significantly associated with the severity of strabismus, parental education level, and family residence, whereas SDS scores only correlated with parental education. No significant associations were found between HADS-A/SAS scores and patient characteristics. Additionally, the HADS assessment required significantly less time to complete than the SAS/SDS (2.54 {+/-} 1.45 minutes vs. 7.25 {+/-} 4.13 minutes, P < 0.001). ConclusionIdentifying psychosocial distress among parents of children with strabismus is crucial for comprehensive care. The HADS emerges as a more efficient and effective tool for assessing emotional well-being compared to the SAS/SDS, highlighting its potential utility in clinical and research settings. Highlights- Study examines psychological issues in parents of children with strabismus. - HADS and SAS/SDS used to assess anxiety and depression in 220 parents. - HADS-A vs. SAS and HADS-D vs. SDS show significant difference in detection rates. - HADS-D score correlates with strabismus severity, parental education, and residence. - HADS is more time-efficient than SAS/SDS, making it suitable for clinical settings.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A psychometric evaluation of the Chinese Impact of Vision Impairment (C-IVI) questionnaire in an adult cohort with high myopia using Rasch Analysis 95%
- Identifying the Influencing Factors for Cataract Surgery Uptake in Malaysia 94%
- Impact of visual impairment on balance and visual processing functions in students with special educational needs 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Relationship Between Clinical Profile, Glycemic Parameters And Hypoglycemia In Type 1 Diabetes Pediatric Patients 92%
- Olfactory Training Efficiency In Post-COVID-19 Persistent Olfactory Disorders 91%
- Quantification of microvascular lesions in the central retinal field: could it predict the severity of diabetic retinopathy? 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation of the patient reported outcome measures tool “Catquest” in Odia language 95%
- Clinicopathological Evaluation of Dry eyes and Ocular surface in Newly diagnosed patients of Hyperthyroidism and Hypothyroidism and its Comparison to Healthy Subjects 95%
- Age Based Trends for Unplanned Pediatric Rehospitalizations in the United States 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Quality of life of Type II Diabetic patients 92%
- Atopic Biomarker Changes after Exposure to Porphyromonas gingivalis Lipopolysaccharide: A Small Experimental Study in Wistar Rat 90%
- Bacterial and Fungal Co-Infections among ICU COVID-19 Hospitalized Patients in a Palestinian Hospital: Incidence and Antimicrobial Stewardship 90%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.