Genome-wide association study meta-analysis brings monogenic hearing loss genes into the polygenic realm
Clifford, R. E.; Johnson, J.; Mackey, C. E.; Mikita, E. A.; Ryan, A. F.; Maihofer, A. X.; Nievergelt, C. M.
Show abstract
BackgroundDisabling age-related and noise-induced sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) affects 5% of the global population and is associated with isolation, depression, cognitive decline, and dementia. SNHL is strongly heritable with a polygenic signature of common genetic variants conferring small risks individually, thus requiring very large studies to achieve statistical power in genome-wide association studies (GWAS). MethodsWe present the first report of a clinical SNHL GWAS in the Million Veteran Program (MVP) cohort. GWAS findings are examined separately within MVP (210,240 cases and 265,275 controls), including multi-ancestry analysis, then combined and contrasted with the United Kingdom Biobank (UKB) self-reported hearing loss study (87,056 cases and 163,333 controls). We perform functional mapping and annotation, gene prioritization, gene-based and gene-set analysis, and cochlear cell type enrichment, including human single-cell results, then compare our results to known hereditary hearing loss genes. Summary results are leveraged to characterize the genetic architecture of SNHL. ResultsSubstantial genetic overlap is seen between MVP and UKB despite differences in phenotypes, demographics, and environmental exposures. Individual GWAS and meta-analyses identify 108 loci, including 54 loci containing novel prioritized genes and/or protein-coding genes. Significant gene ontology pathways include "sensory perception of mechanical stimulus," "ear development," "actin-binding," and "cytoskeletal protein binding," indicative of mechanosensory structure and function in the cochlea. GWAS and gene-based analyses implicate 17 known familial hearing loss genes, expressing proteins in regions of hair cells, Type 1 neurons, stria vascularis, and subcellular regions of stereociliae, rootlets, and notably, mechanoelectrical transduction tip-links. Although risk for polygenic SNHL is predominantly captured by SNPs outside of congenital HHL genes (HHL), SNP-based partitioned heritability estimates show a 3.26-fold enrichment of HHL relative to other genes. ConclusionIn the largest GWAS to date, combining clinical diagnosis of hearing loss and self-report data from two cohorts, we identify 108 loci with 54 novel genes. Despite the increased enrichment of HHL genes, 97% of the risk for adult SNHL is captured by SNPs outside of HHL genes. Although SNHL in the UKB and MVP were assessed using different phenotypes, genetic signals between the two cohorts are predominantly shared, and locus discovery is boosted through increased sample size in meta-analysis.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Biological insights from multi-omic analysis of 31 genomic risk loci for adult hearing difficulty 97%
- Accurate phenotypic classification and exome sequencing allow identification of novel genes and variants associated with adult-onset hearing loss 94%
- Pleiotropy method identifies genetic overlap between orofacial clefts at multiple loci from GWAS of multi-ethnictrios 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Syndrome-informed phenotyping identifies a polygenic background for achondroplasia-like facial variation in the general population 94%
- The impact of non-additive genetic associations on age-related complex diseases. 93%
- Cell-specific delivery of GJB2 restores auditory function in mouse models of DFNB1 deafness and mediates appropriate expression in NHP cochlea 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Widespread recessive effects on common diseases in a cohort of 44,000 British Pakistanis and Bangladeshis with high autozygosity 94%
- The impact of 22q11.2 copy number variants on human traits in the general population 93%
- Disentangling mechanisms behind the pleiotropic effects of proximal 16p11.2 BP4-5 CNVs 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.