Physical Network Constraints Define the Lognormal Architecture of the Brain's Connectome
Piazza, B.; Barabasi, D. L.; Ferreira Castro, A.; Menichetti, G.; Barabasi, A.-L.
Show abstract
The brain has long been conceptualized as a network of neurons connected by synapses. However, attempts to describe the connectome using established network science models have yielded conflicting outcomes, leaving the architecture of neural networks unresolved. Here, by performing a comparative analysis of eight experimentally mapped connectomes, we find that their degree distributions cannot be captured by the well-established random or scale-free models. Instead, the node degrees and strengths are well approximated by lognormal distributions, although these lack a mechanistic explanation in the context of the brain. By acknowledging the physical network nature of the brain, we show that neuron size is governed by a stochastic multiplicative process, which allows us to analytically derive the lognormal nature of the neuron length distribution. Our framework not only predicts the degree and strength distributions across each of the eight connectomes, but also yields a series of empirically falsifiable relationships between different neuron characteristics. The resulting multiplicative network represents a novel architecture for network science, whose distinctive quantitative features bridge critical gaps between neural structure and function, with implications for brain dynamics, robustness, and synchronization.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Flexible control of representational dynamics in a disinhibition-based model of decision making 97%
- Mechanisms of distributed working memory in a large-scale network of macaque neocortex 97%
- Cost-precision trade-off relation determines the optimal morphogen gradient for accurate biological pattern formation 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.