Back

Influence of contextual exposure on memory strength and precision for inhibitory avoidance in male and female rats

Holm, A. R.; Radley, J. J.; LaLumiere, R. T.

2025-03-01 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.02.27.640186 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Aversive associative learning paradigms such as inhibitory avoidance (IA) are frequently used to examine episodic-like memories in rodents. In IA, rodents learn to associate a context with a footshock, followed by testing for memory strength in the original training context and for memory precision in a similar yet distinct neutral context. The present work assessed the effects of different contextual exposure procedures on memory strength and precision in IA at both recent and remote time points using male and female Long-Evans rats. An initial experiment found that rats kept in the lit (non-shock) compartment of the IA apparatus for 60 s during training, as opposed to 10 s, displayed enhanced memory strength, with discrimination between both chambers at the recent retention test and generalization at the remote retention test. Subsequent experiments investigated the effects of contextual pre-exposure the day before training. The results indicate that pre-exposure to the neutral context promoted generalization without altering memory strength compared to the first experiment. In contrast, pre-exposure to the aversive chamber promoted discrimination and enhanced memory strength. Notably, the different procedures yielded similar effects in both sexes. However, the results also indicate an overall pattern of greater contextual discrimination in females compared to males. These findings provide evidence for how different contextual exposures influence the degree of encoding at the time of training and a behavioral foundation for future studies examining the neurobiological mechanisms underlying memory strength and precision in IA, while highlighting the importance of using both sexes in initial behavioral work. Significance StatementStrength and precision are two fundamental properties of memory that can be simultaneously measured using inhibitory avoidance (IA), a type of context-footshock association task. However, little is known about how different context exposures alter rats encoding of these memories, thereby influencing subsequent memory strength and precision. Here, we found that pre-exposure to the neutral IA chamber decreased memory precision, whereas pre-exposure to the aversive IA chamber promoted memory strength and precision. Additionally, females demonstrated overall enhanced memory precision compared to males. These results indicate that different types of contextual exposures influence initial IA encoding and add to a limited body of research examining memory strength and precision in IA in both sexes.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.3%
2
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
3
Learning & Memory
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
Hippocampus
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
5
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.0%
7
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
8
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.8%
9
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
10
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 42%
1.7%
12
Psychopharmacology
59 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
13
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.8%
15
Hormones and Behavior
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
16
Neurobiology of Aging
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
17
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
18
Psychoneuroendocrinology
33 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
19
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
20
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
21
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
22
Neurobiology of Stress
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
23
npj Science of Learning
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%