Back

Pathway-specific genomic alterations in pancreatic cancer across diverse cohorts

Monge, C.; Waldrup, B.; Carranza, F. G.; Velazquez-Villarreal, E.

2025-03-03 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2025.02.27.25323058 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background/ObjectivesPancreatic cancer (PC) is an aggressive malignancy with rising incidence and poor survival rates. While Hispanic/Latino (H/L) patients have a lower overall incidence compared to Non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients, they are diagnosed at younger ages, often present with more advanced disease, and experience worse survival outcomes. The molecular drivers underlying these disparities remain poorly understood. Key oncogenic pathways, including TP53, WNT, PI3K, TGF-Beta, and RTK/RAS, play crucial roles in tumor progression, therapy resistance, and response to targeted treatments. However, their ethnicity-specific alterations and prognostic implications in PC remain largely unexplored. This study aims to characterize pathway-specific mutations in PC among H/L and NHW patients, assess tumor mutation burden, and identify ethnicity-specific oncogenic drivers using publicly available datasets. The findings may provide critical insights to optimize precision medicine strategies and enhance targeted therapies for underrepresented populations. MethodsA bioinformatics analysis was performed using publicly available PC datasets to evaluate mutation frequencies in genes associated with the TGF-Beta, RTK/RAS, WNT, PI3K, and TP53 pathways. The study included 4,248 patients, with 407 identified as H/L and 3,841 as NHW. Patients were stratified by ethnicity to assess differences in mutation prevalence. Chi-squared tests were conducted to compare mutation rates between groups, while Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to evaluate overall survival differences based on pathway-specific alterations. ResultsSignificant differences were observed in the TGF-Beta pathway between H/L and NHW patients. TGF-Beta mutations were less prevalent in H/L patients (18.4% vs. 24.4%, p = 8.6e-3). Additionally, genes related to the TGF-Beta pathway showed significant alterations, with SMAD2 (1.5% vs. 0.4%, p = 6.3e-3) and SMAD4 (15% vs. 19.9%, p = 0.02) exhibiting notable differences. Although RTK/RAS, WNT, PI3K, and TP53 pathway mutations were not statistically significant overall, borderline significance was observed in genes associated with these pathways, including ERBB4 (3.4% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.03), ALK (2.7% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.01), HRAS (1.2% vs. 0.1%, p = 1.3e-4), and RIT1 (0.7% vs. 0.1%, p = 0.03) in the RTK/RAS pathway, as well as CTNNB1 (2.9% vs. 1.3%, p = 0.01) in the WNT pathway. Survival analysis revealed no significant differences in overall survival among H/L patients. However, NHW patients with TP53 pathway alterations exhibited borderline significant differences in survival outcomes.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.0%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.6%
3
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.1%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 14%
5.7%
5
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
6
Molecular Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
8
Cancer Research Communications
51 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.8%
9
Cancer Medicine
26 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
10
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
11
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.6%
12
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
13
Cell & Bioscience
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
14
Experimental Neurology
61 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
15
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
16
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
17
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
18
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
19
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
Molecular Oncology
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
22
International Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
23
Journal of Medical Genetics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
24
Genomics
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
25
Molecular Biology Reports
21 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
26
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
102 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
27
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%
28
Annals of Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
29
The American Journal of Pathology
32 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.5%
30
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.5%