Livestock-related deaths in Great Britain (2010-2023)
Chartres, A.; Oultram, J. W.; Royden, A.; Shanks, S.; Tulloch, J. S. P.
Show abstract
ObjectivesThis study aimed to describe the incidence, demographics, and context of livestock-related deaths 2010-2023. Study designA descriptive analysis of the Health and Safety Executives Fatal injuries in agriculture, forestry and fishing in Great Britain annual reports. MethodsAnnual incidence of death was calculated. Demographic and contextual information were extracted, and data stratified by whether the victim was a farmer or member of the public. Statistical comparisons were made using Chi2 tests, Fishers exact test, and Mann Witney U Tests, where appropriate. ResultsOut of 78 livestock-related fatalities, 97% were caused by domestic cattle and 74.3% were farmers. Median age of all fatalities was 67 (range:29-87), and 63.4% were alone at the point of injury. Farmers were predominantly male and tended to be working with individual animals, often in a contained space. All members of the public were killed in fields and 84.2% had a dog present with them. They were 250 times more likely to have a dog present than farmers (OR=250, p<0.001). A calf or per-parturient cow was more likely to be present when a member of the public was killed (OR=4.3, p<0.01). ConclusionsCattle-related incidents are a concern and further research is required to enable the development and implementation of effective safety interventions. We recommend that a database of livestock-related injuries is created, measures are introduced so farmers can easily temporarily divert public rights of way, and educational programmes for farmers and the public are developed.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 and associated risk factors among healthcare workers in the Eastern Cape, South Africa 91%
- COVID-19 outbreak rates and infection attack rates associated with the workplace: a descriptive epidemiological study 91%
- Experiences of supported isolation in returning travellers during the early COVID-19 response: an interview study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Is there a higher risk of exposure to Coxiella burnetii for pre-clinical veterinary students? 91%
- A standardized instrument quantifying risk factors associated with bi-directional transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and other zoonotic pathogens: The COVID-19 Human-Animal Interactions Survey (CHAIS) 90%
- Wild boar trade and African swine fever risk of introduction into new territories: A quantitative release assessment with retrospective data of wild boar shipments to France and Spain (2010-2017). 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.