Simplified Co-extraction of total Nucleic Acids from Respiratory Samples for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and SARS-CoV-2 optimized for compatibility across Diagnostic Platforms
Modi, N.; Dunkley, O. R. S.; Bell, A.; Hennig, E.; Wats, A.; Huang, Y.; Daivaa, N.; Myhrvold, C. A.; Xie, Y. L.; Banada, P. P.
Show abstract
Tuberculosis (TB) and COVID-19 are leading infectious diseases with high mortality, caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) and SARS-CoV-2 (SC2), respectively. Co-infection is common but is often undiagnosed as it is challenging to process both pathogens from a single sample. In this study, we present a simple and efficient method for co-extracting nucleic acids (NA) from these two distinct respiratory pathogens for downstream diagnostic testing. We evaluated three different nucleic acid amplification (NAA)-based platforms, LightCycler480 (LC480) qPCR, Qiacuity digital PCR (dPCR), and Cytation3 for CRISPR-Cas13a-based SHINE-TB/SC2 detection assays. Chelex-100 chelating resin-based boiling preparation method was optimized for Mtb NA extraction from saliva and sputum. Saliva showed compatibility with all three platforms, with sensitivity as low as 100 CFU/ml (or 2 genomic copies/{micro}l). This method worked well for sputum using dPCR at 100% (21/21) positivity, though the CRISPR-based SHINE-TB assay showed more variability and sensitivity to sputum inhibitor carry-over, resulting in an 81% positive rate (17/21). Diluting sputum with TE buffer (1:1) improved the detection (2/4). Extraction efficiency of our method was 48%, 62.2%, 86.4% and 99.3% for concentrations 105, 104, 103 and 10 CFU/ml, respectively. The dynamic range for Mtb spiked in pooled sputum showed 100% detection (N=8) at [≥]103 CFU/ml with all three methods. Dual-pathogen co-extraction and detection of SC2 (105 PFU/ml) and Mtb (105 CFU/ml) in salivary sputum was successful using CRISPR-Cas13a assays. We have developed a rapid and efficient co-extraction method for multi-pathogen testing across diagnostic platforms and believe this is the first protocol optimized to co-extract Mtb and SARS-CoV-2 from a single sample.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Optimal processing of tongue swab samples for Mycobacterium tuberculosis detection by the Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra assay 96%
- Multiplex Target-Redundant RT-LAMP for Robust Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Using Fluorescent Universal Displacement Probes 95%
- Digital PCR discriminates between SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants and immune escape mutations 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation of a rapid, saliva-based, and ultra-sensitive SARS-CoV-2 screening system for a pandemic-scale infection surveillance 94%
- A needle in a haystack: metagenomic DNA sequencing to quantify Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA and diagnose tuberculosis 94%
- Sensitive detection and quantification of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Lipobiotin-capture magnetic bead assay for isolation, enrichment and detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from saliva 97%
- WHotLAMP: A simple, inexpensive, and sensitive molecular test for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva 95%
- Multicenter international assessment of a SARS-CoV-2 RT-LAMP test for point of care clinical application 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation of a Single-step, Single-tube Reverse Transcription-Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Assay for Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA 94%
- Evaluation of sample collection and transport strategies to enhance yield, accessibility, and biosafety of COVID-19 RT-PCR testing 93%
- Acceptable Performance of the Abbott ID NOW Among Symptomatic Individuals with Confirmed COVID-19 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.