How and why do Australians obtain blood pressure devices for use at home? A mixed-methods study.
Clapham, E.; Carmichael, S.; Picone, D. S.; Schutte, A. E.; Slater, K.; Stevens, J.; Nelson, M. R.; Schlaich, M. P.; Tsuyuki, R. T.; Climie, R.; Stergiou, G. S.; Campbell, N. R. C.; Chapman, N.
Show abstract
BackgroundOnly 10-20% of blood pressure (BP) devices available are validated. Little is known about how and why patients choose BP devices for home BP measurement (HBPM), which was the aim of this study. MethodsMixed-methods study (online survey (n=241), phone interviews among a purposive subsample (n=27)) among adults who perform HBPM in Australia (June-Dec 2023). Survey questions determined how BP devices were obtained, device make/model and factors influencing device selection. Interviews further explored these topics. Device validation status was determined using the STRIDE BP and Medaval websites. ResultsParticipants were middle aged (58{+/-}16 years, 52% women) and 91% purchased a device for HBPM (n=189; 9% borrowed a device), with 69% (n=130) purchased from pharmacies (53% validated) and 21% (n=39) purchased online (51% validated). Accuracy was said to be the most important consideration when choosing a device for most participants (n=129, 77%). Interview participants described using brand recognition, online reviews and cost to select an accurate device; avoiding cheaper devices and preferring brands used in healthcare settings. Participants did not consider validation status and did not receive advice on device accuracy at point-of-sale. ConclusionThis study highlights real world experiences of adults when obtaining HBPM devices that can be used to inform strategies to direct adults to validated devices. Strategies such as increasing signage at the point-of-sale and training healthcare practitioners to identify and direct consumers to validated devices may be effective in increasing uptake. Regulatory bodies should mandate the sale of validated devices in healthcare settings to increase availability. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=149 SRC="FIGDIR/small/24318446v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (39K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@15291cdorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1e22c75org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1d4eeb5org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@83e35b_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Telehealth versus Self-Directed Lifestyle Intervention to Promote Healthy Blood Pressure: A Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial 93%
- Assessing the Safety of Home Oximetry for Covid-19: A multi-site retrospective observational study 91%
- Wireless physical activity monitor use among adults living with HIV in a community-based exercise intervention study: a quantitative longitudinal observational study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patterns of Adherence to Home BP Monitoring in the e-Framingham Heart Study 94%
- Empowering Healthcare Professionals in West Africa □ A Feasibility Study and Qualitative Assessment of a Dietary Screening Tool to Identify Adults at High Risk of Hypertension 94%
- Attrition and associated factors among patients on chronic antihypertensive therapy at Mulago hospital, Uganda: A mixed method study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Acceptability of fixed-dose combination treatments for hypertension in Kenya: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability 94%
- Access to hypertension services and health-seeking experiences in rural Coastal Kenya: A qualitative study 92%
- Prevalence of Hypertension and Associated Factors among Nurses Working in Private and Public Tertiary Hospitals in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trends and variation in prescribing of suboptimal statin treatment regimes: a cohort study in English primary care 92%
- Trends and variation in unsafe prescribing of methotrexate: a cohort study in English NHS primary care. 90%
- Variation in prescription duration for long term conditions: a cohort study in English NHS primary care using OpenPrescribing 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Home monitoring of HbA1c in diabetes mellitus: A protocol for systematic review and narrative synthesis on reliability, accuracy, and patient acceptability 91%
- Expectations and attitudes in primary care towards home-based testing for diagnosing asthma: a mixed methods study 89%
- A mixed-methods evaluation of patients’ views on primary care multi-disciplinary teams in Scotland 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.