Back

Modulation of negative affective biases in male rats may predict the rapid and sustained antidepressant effects of different NMDA antagonists

Hinchcliffe, J. K.; Kamenish, K.; Bartlett, J.; Arban, R.; Hengerer, B.; Robinson, E. S. J.

2025-03-02 pharmacology and toxicology
10.1101/2025.02.26.640447 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Affective biases influence cognitive and emotional behaviour and play a significant role in major depressive disorder. We have shown that the NMDA antagonist and rapid-acting antidepressant, ketamine, selectively modulates affective biases, a neuropsychological effect which may underlie its efficacy. Clinical studies with different NMDA antagonists have found mixed effects but the reasons for these differences in efficacy are not understood. This study used a rat model of negative affective biases to investigate if different NMDA antagonists also differentially modulated affective biases. Dose-response experiments using the NMDA antagonists lanicemine, memantine, CP101,606, phencyclidine (PCP) and ephenidine, and ketamine metabolite, (2R,6R)-hydroxynorketamine (HNK), were performed to test their acute and sustained (24hrs) effects, and specificity of affective bias modulation. Our results showed that HNK, PCP, lanicemine, and ephenidine acutely attenuate negative biases. HNK, CP-101,606, and ephenidines effects were sustained at 24hrs post-treatment with a positive bias observed for HNK and a tendency towards a positive affective bias for CP101,606 and ephenidine. Lanicemines effects were sustained at 24hrs but only at the highest dose and PCP and memantine had no effects. Considering these findings in the context of clinical observations, we suggest that the ability to induce a sustained modulation of affective biases corresponds with therapeutic effects. The differences in efficacy observed with NMDA antagonists may be related to their ion trapping properties and those with very high and low ion trapping properties are less effective than those with more moderate ion trapping effects such as ketamine or ephenidine or the subunit selective antagonist, CP101,606.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Neuropsychopharmacology
153 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.7%
2
International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.5%
3
Psychopharmacology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.7%
4
British Journal of Pharmacology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.7%
5
Frontiers in Pharmacology
111 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.1%
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
Neuropharmacology
68 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.7%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.3%
9
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
60 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.9%
10
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
40 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
11
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
12
Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
13
The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
14
Journal of Psychopharmacology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
15
Behavioural Brain Research
77 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
16
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
41 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
17
Translational Psychiatry
260 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
18
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
48 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
19
Addiction Biology
51 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
20
Biomedicines
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
Biological Psychiatry
137 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
22
Pharmacological Research
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
23
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
24
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
25
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.6%