Back

Eukaryotes' closest relatives are internally simple syntrophic archaea

Imachi, H.; Nobu, M. K.; Ishii, S.; Hirakata, Y.; Ikuta, T.; Isaji, Y.; Miyata, M.; Miyazaki, M.; Morono, Y.; Murata, K.; Nakagawa, S.; Ogawara, M.; Okada, S.; Saito, Y.; Sakai, S.; Shimamura, S.; Tahara, Y. O.; Takaki, Y.; Takano, Y.; Tasumi, E.; Uematsu, K.; Yoshimura, T.; Takai, K.

2025-02-26 microbiology Community evaluation
10.1101/2025.02.26.640444 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Eukaryotes are theorized to have originated from an archaeal phylum Promethearchaeota (formerly Asgard archaea)1,2. The first cultured representatives revealed valuable insight3,4 but are distantly related to the first eukaryotic common ancestor (FECA), leaving many unknowns regarding this archaeons biology. Here, we report isolation of two strains belonging to the order proposed as FECAs closest relative, Hodarchaeales,5 as members of a pure co- and tri-culture with methanogenic partners. Both are obligately anaerobic, syntrophic, peptide-degrading, and mesophilic archaea that have simple internal cell structure and produce protrusions and vesicles, like Promethearchaeales3,4. All strains demonstrate behavior focused on cell construction rather than division, unlike typical prokaryotes6. Strain HC1 possesses genes associated with aerobic lifestyles but lacks complete pathways for aerobic respiration and co-cultures cannot grow under (micro)aerobic conditions, suggesting the genes support oxygen detoxification rather than respiration. Reflecting this, HC1 can survive and grow under microaerobic conditions only when aerobic organisms are present. Phylogenetic analyses indicate FECA may have possessed these genes and thus some aerotolerance. Physiological, genomic, and phylogenetic observations indicate FECA was a simple-celled anaerobic syntrophic peptide-degrading archaeon with a non-growth-centric lifestyle and potential adaptations towards an oxygenated planet--the archaea-eukaryote transition was steep in both cell structure and aerobiosis.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.