Back

Temporal mapping of the anti-tumor effects of nanobody-based MSLN.CAR-T cell therapy in metastatic solid tumors

Stathopoulou, C.; Zhao, M.; Jiang, Q.; Hong, J.; Bian, J.; Zhang, J.; Ho, M.; Hassan, R.

2025-03-02 immunology
10.1101/2025.02.26.640438 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Studies on the dynamic changes occurring in the tumor microenvironment (TME) following CAR-T cell therapy have been confounded by host lymphodepletion, multiple dosing and immunodeficient models. Here, a nanobody-based, mouse mesothelin-targeting CAR-T cell (A101) was developed, achieving effective primary tumor suppression, metastasis reduction, and improved survival after a single dose in immunocompetent, syngeneic mouse models without lymphodepletion. Temporal tumor profiling using RNA sequencing revealed initial downregulation of cell proliferation genes followed by upregulation of inflammation, epithelial-to-mesenchymal-transition (EMT) and extracellular matrix (ECM) modification genes in the CAR-T-treated tumors relative to mock-T-treated controls. This phenotype was reversed at a later timepoint which coincided with downregulation of immunosuppressive Cd274+ Lcn2+ neutrophils and upregulation of anti-tumor P2rx1+ Nrf2- neutrophils. At the same time, upregulation of Ccl2+ in fibroblasts and a more immunomodulatory macrophage phenotype was observed in CAR-T-treated tumors, indicating a tumor adaptation mechanism. This study demonstrates complex dynamic changes in the TME, and highlights time-dependent responses of solid tumors to CAR-T cell therapy. It further highlights Lcn2+ neutrophils and Ccl2+ fibroblasts as potential therapeutic targets for improving CAR-T cell anti-tumor efficacy. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=176 SRC="FIGDIR/small/640438v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (55K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@88ec4org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1d4fa64org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@182e11aorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1889182_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOGraphical abstract.C_FLOATNO Tumor responses to A101 CAR-T cell treatment. C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
75 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.9%
2
Cancer Letters
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.8%
3
OncoImmunology
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
Cancer Immunology Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
5
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.4%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.9%
7
Theranostics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
8
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.9%
9
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
10
Molecular Therapy
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
11
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
12
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.4%
13
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.4%
14
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.4%
15
European Journal of Immunology
60 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
16
JCI Insight
277 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
17
Oncogene
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
18
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
International Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
21
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
22
Cell Communication and Signaling
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%