A Novel Method to Disentangle Tightly Linked Risk and Resilience Genes for Brain Disorders Application to Alzheimers Disease
Barnett, E. J.; Hess, J. L.; Hou, J.; Escott-Price, V.; Fennema-Notestine, C.; Kremen, W.; Lin, S.-J.; Zhang, C.; Gaiteri, C.; Elman, J.; Holmans, P.; Faraone, S. V.; Glatt, S. J.
Show abstract
Genetic risk factors for neuropsychiatric disorders are well documented. However, some individuals with high genetic risk remain unaffected, and the mechanisms underlying such resilience remain poorly understood. The presence of protective resilience factors that mitigate risk could help explain the disconnect between predicted risk and reality, particularly when genetic contributions are substantial but incompletely understood. Identifying and studying resilience factors could improve our understanding of pathology, enhance risk prediction, and inform preventive measures or treatment strategies. However, such efforts are complicated by the difficulty of identifying resilience that is separable from low risk. We developed a novel adversarial multi-task neural network model to detect genetic resilience markers. The model learns to separate high-risk unaffected individuals from affected individuals at similar risk while "unlearning" patterns found in low-risk groups using adversarial learning. In simulated and existing Alzheimers disease (AD) datasets, we identified markers of resilience with a feature-importance-based approach that prioritized specificity, generated resilience scores, and analyzed associations with polygenic risk scores (PRS). In simulations, our model had high specificity and sensitivity in identifying resilience markers, significantly outperforming traditional approaches. Applied to AD data, the model generated genetic resilience scores protective against AD and independent of PRS. We identified five resilience-associated SNPs, including known AD-associated variants, underscoring their potential involvement in resilience. Our findings support the utility of resilience scores in modifying risk predictions, particularly for high-risk groups. Expanding this method could aid in understanding resilience mechanisms, potentially improving diagnosis, prevention, and treatment strategies for AD and other brain disorders.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Scalable Bayesian functional GWAS method accounting for multivariate quantitative functional annotations with applications to studying Alzheimer’s disease 94%
- Genotyping TOMM40’523 Poly-T Polymorphisms Using Whole-Genome Sequencing 94%
- The genetic architecture of Alzheimer disease risk in the Ohio and Indiana Amish 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Bayesian transcriptome-wide association study method leveraging both cis- and trans- eQTL information through summary statistics 95%
- The Causal Pivot: A Structural Approach to Genetic Heterogeneity and Variant Discovery in Complex Diseases 94%
- Non-Coding and Loss-of-Function Coding Variants in TET2 are Associated with Multiple Neurodegenerative Diseases 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.