Genetically-Determined Low-density Lipoprotein in Ischemic Stroke Survivors
Wu, K.; Huo, S.; Rivier, C. A.; Torres-Lopez, V.; Sharma, R.; de Havenon, A.; Worrall, B. B.; Sheth, K. N.; Falcone, G. J.
Show abstract
Background and ObjectivesPolygenic susceptibility to hypertension and diabetes negatively impacts the clinical trajectory of ischemic stroke survivors. We hypothesize that polygenic susceptibility to hyperlipidemia (PSH) negatively impacts cholesterol control in this same population. MethodsWe conducted a genetic association study using data from the Vitamin Intervention Stroke Prevention (VISP) study, a clinical trial that enrolled survivors of ischemic stroke. PSH was modeled through a polygenic risk score built with 38 independent genetic risk variants for LDL-c that was divided into <20, 20-80, and >80 percentile categories labeled as low, intermediate and high PSH. We used multivariable linear, logistic and Cox regression, as appropriate, to test whether high PSH was associated with risk of uncontrolled hyperlipidemia (LDL-c > 100mg/dl), resistant hyperlipidemia (LDL-c > 100mg/dl despite statin treatment) and clinical outcomes. We replicated our findings in a cohort of ischemic stroke survivors enrolled in the UK Biobank. Results1,567 ischemic stroke survivors (mean age 68 years, 35% female) enrolled in VISP were included in the study. Stroke survivors with higher versus low PSH had 66% higher risk of uncontrolled hyperlipidemia (OR 1.66, 95%CI 1.17-2.36), 83% higher risk of resistant hyperlipidemia (1.83, 95%CI 1.00-3.37), twice the risk of recurrent stroke (HR 2.03, 95%CI 1.14-3.61) and 80% higher risk of acute coronary events (HR 1.81, 95%CI 1.18-2.78). The association between high PSH and higher risk of uncontrolled and resistant hyperlipidemia were replicated in 1,634 stroke survivors (mean age 61, 32% female sex) enrolled in the UK Biobank (OR 2.34, 95%CI 1.68-3.28 and OR 2.33, 95%CI 1.61-3.38, respectively). DiscussionAmong acute ischemic stroke survivors, higher PSH is associated with worse lipid control and higher risk of recurrent vascular events. Combined with existing evidence on the role of adverse genetic profiles in blood pressure and blood control in this population, our findings support the comprehensive evaluation of polygenic profiles as a cause of failed risk factor control in stroke survivors.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Leveraging genetic data to elucidate the relationship between Covid-19 and ischemic stroke 97%
- Diet-derived antioxidants do not decrease the risk of ischemic stroke: a Mendelian Randomization Study in over 1 million participants 94%
- Genetic downregulation of interleukin-6 signaling and arteriolosclerotic cerebral small vessel disease: a drug target Mendelian randomization analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Polygenic Susceptibility to Diabetes and Poor Glycemic Control in Stroke Survivors 97%
- Interplay between Chronic Kidney disease, Hypertension, and Stroke: Insights from a Multivariable Mendelian Randomization Analysis 95%
- Circulating interleukin-6 levels and incident ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based cohort studies 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The association between lymphocyte mitochondrial DNA abundance and Stroke: a combination of multivariable-adjusted survival and mendelian randomization analyses 95%
- Polygenic Hyperlipidemias and Coronary Artery Disease Risk 95%
- LDLR Variant Classification for Improved Cardiovascular Risk Prediction in Familial Hypercholesterolemia 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetically Predicted IL-18 Inhibition and Risk of Cardiovascular Events: A Mendelian Randomization Study 94%
- Implications of cranial arterial stenosis and dolichoectasia for cerebral small vessel disease etiopathogenesis: findings from a prospective mild stroke cohort 92%
- Adverse pregnancy outcomes and coronary artery disease risk: A negative control Mendelian randomization study 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.