The effect of a digital health physical activity program integrating gamification for obesity management in comparison to the usual care: a randomized controlled trial with ideographic approach
Mazeas, A.; Chalabaev, A.; Blond, M.; Mourgues, C.; Pereira, B.; Duclos, M.
Show abstract
Digital health interventions and gamification hold promise for managing chronic diseases, but evidence comparing their efficacy to usual care is limited. This two-arm parallel randomized controlled trial with embedded N-of-1 analyses assessed whether a digital intervention integrating gamification and telecoaching (Kiplin) outperform a supervised face-to-face adapted physical activity (PA) program (usual care) in obesity management. Patients with obesity and/or T2D (N = 50, Mage = 46.7 years, 74% female) were randomized to either the Kiplin digital intervention or usual care group, and completed a 3-month program with a 6-month follow-up. The primary outcome was the change in daily step count between baseline and the interventions end. Secondary outcomes assessed changes in daily steps, PA, quality of life, body composition, and physical capacities over nine months. Mixed-effects models and generative additive models were conducted to analyze both between- and within-person evolutions in PA. A cost-utility analysis was computed to compare the cost-effectiveness of the programs. Compared to usual care, Kiplin participants showed significant increases in daily steps during the intervention and follow-up periods, with sustained effect sizes. Idiographic analyses revealed variable individual responses, highlighting the need for tailored approaches. No significant differences were observed in secondary clinical outcomes or the cost-utility analysis. This study demonstrates the potential of digital interventions to sustain PA improvements that could offer an alternative to face-to-face programs, but the clinical and economic impacts need to be further evaluated.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- An mHealth app using machine learning to increase physical activity in diabetes and depression: clinical trial protocol for the DIAMANTE Study 95%
- Correlates of and changes in aerobic physical activity and strength training before and after the onset of COVID-19 pandemic in the UK – findings from the HEBECO study 94%
- Wireless physical activity monitor use among adults living with HIV in a community-based exercise intervention study: a quantitative longitudinal observational study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Supervised and self-directed technology-based dual-task exercise training programme for older adults at risk of falling – Protocol for a feasibility study 95%
- Heavy Resistance Exercise Training in Older Men: A Responder and Inter-individual Variability Analysis 94%
- Feasibility of individualized home exercise programs for patients with head and neck cancer – study protocol and first results of a multicentre single-arm intervention trial (OSHO #94) 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cardiovascular, respiratory and functional effects of tele-supervised home-based exercise training in individuals recovering from COVID-19 hospitalization: A randomized clinical trial 93%
- Descriptive epidemiology of cardiorespiratory fitness in UK adults: The Fenland Study 92%
- Physical activity and posture profile of a South African cohort of middle-aged men and women as determined by integrated hip and thigh accelerometry 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Dementia Risk and Dynamic Response to Exercise: Methodology for an Acute Exericise Clinical Trial 93%
- Multiple bouts of high-intensity interval exercise reverse age-related functional connectivity disruptions without affecting motor learning in older adults 92%
- Longitudinal associations between physical activity and other health behaviours during the COVID-19 pandemic: A fixed effects analysis 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.