Frequent Presenters to Southern New Zealand Emergency Departments differ from other ED attenders
Tamberg, Y.; Roy, M.; de Souza, W. R.; Eastwood, J.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo compare patterns and characteristics of emergency department visits initiated by frequent presenters and other ED attenders. MethodsWe performed a quantitative retrospective data analysis of routinely collected ED data across three public hospitals within New Zealands Southern district. The study population comprised: (1) frequent presenters (i.e., patients who visited any of the EDs on 10 or more occasions in any continuous 365-day period between 01/01/2018 and 31/12/2022) and (2) all other ED presenters during the same period. We compared visit-based and per-person metrics characterising presentation flow, utilization patterns and demographics. ResultsFrequent presenters constituted 0.6% of all ED attenders (1259 out of 196136) and initiated 6.8% of all ED visits (32541 out of 479975). Visits by frequent presenters showed no seasonality or day-of-the-week patterns and occurred mostly during daylight hours. Frequent presenters differed from non-frequent presenters by having more clustered visits, shorter intervals between presentations, higher presentation severity (more visits were triaged urgent and above), more arrivals by ambulance and police, higher incomplete treatment rate, more referrals and short stay admissions. ConclusionFrequent presenters make a sizeable contribution to ED load in terms of visit numbers and urgency. The nature of differences between frequent and non-frequent presenters indicate greater and more complex health needs in the former cohort. At the same time the diversity of visits in the frequent presenters histories shows potential for redirecting some patients and/or presentations to other care providers. Key findingsO_LIFrequent presenters make a small portion of total patients, but contribute disproportionately to ED load. High visit numbers and greater acuity indicate more complex health needs in this cohort. C_LIO_LIFrequent presenters differ from other ED attenders by having more clustered visits, shorter intervals between presentations, higher presentation acuity (more visits triaged urgent and above), more arrivals by ambulance and police, higher incomplete treatment rate, and required more referrals and short stay admissions. C_LIO_LIVisits by frequent presenters showed no seasonality or day-of-the-week patterns and occurred mostly during daylight hours. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Triaging and Referring In Adjacent General and Emergency Departments (the TRIAGE trial): a cluster randomised controlled trial 95%
- Derivation and validation of a triage tool for acutely ill adults with suspected COVID-19: The PRIEST observational cohort study 93%
- A comparison of self-triage tools to nurse driven triage in the emergency department 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Understanding good communication in ambulance pre-alerts to Emergency Department. Findings from a qualitative study of UK emergency services 94%
- Predictors of adverse outcome in patients with suspected COVID-19 managed in a ‘virtual hospital’ setting: a cohort study 93%
- Validating the RISE UP score for predicting prognosis in patients with COVID-19 in the emergency department, a retrospective study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of atypical intrahospital transfers on patient outcomes: a mixed methods study 94%
- Using explainable machine learning to identify patients at risk of reattendance at discharge from emergency departments 92%
- Disparities in outcomes among patients diagnosed with cancer associated with emergency department visits 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Accuracy of the National Early Warning Score version 2 (NEWS2) in predicting need for time-critical treatment: Retrospective observational cohort study 95%
- High use of the emergency department shows typical features of complex systems: analysis of multicentre linked data 95%
- Variation in ambulance pre-alert process and practice: Cross-sectional survey of ambulance clinicians 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Remote Covid Assessment in Primary Care (RECAP) risk prediction tool: derivation and real-world validation studies 91%
- COVID-19 collateral: Indirect acute effects of the pandemic on physical and mental health in the UK 90%
- An external validation of the QCovid risk prediction algorithm for risk of mortality from COVID-19 in adults: national validation cohort study in England 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.