Back

Identification of multivariate phenotypes most influenced by mutation: Drosophila serrata wings as a case study

McGuigan, K.; Conradsen, C.

2025-03-01 genetics
10.1101/2025.02.25.640174 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The distribution of pleiotropic mutational effects impacts phenotypic adaptation. However, small effect sizes and high sampling error of covariances hinder investigations of the factors influencing this distribution. Here, we explored the potential for shared information across traits affected by the same mutations to counter sampling error, allowing robust characterisation of patterns of mutational input. Exploiting a published dataset representing 12 samples of the same mutation accumulation experiment in Drosophila serrata, we inferred robust signals of mutational effects from the concordance across samples. Krzanowski common subspace analysis identified a multivariate wing trait with statistically supported mutational variance in all samples. Importantly, this multivariate trait was aligned with the major axis of among-line (mutational) variance within most population samples. That is, despite considerable heterogeneity among samples in individual (co)variance parameter estimates, the predominant pattern of correlated mutational effects was identified in datasets reflecting a typical mutation accumulation experimental design. Two other multivariate traits were statistically supported across most samples. Smaller effect sizes (lower mutational variance) with concomitant larger sampling error or other factors (e.g., microenvironmental dependence of effects) may reduce the robustness of estimated mutational input for these traits. Overall, our results suggest sampling error does not preclude multivariate analyses of mutation accumulation experiments from extending our knowledge of pleiotropic mutational effects.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 1%
9.9%
2
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
7.0%
3
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
7.0%
4
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.2%
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.2%
6
Heredity
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
7
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.7%
8
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.1%
9
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
10
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.9%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 27%
3.5%
12
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.0%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.7%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
15
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
16
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
17
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
18
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
19
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
20
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
21
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
22
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
23
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
24
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
25
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
26
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.7%
30
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 48%
0.6%