Back

Potency and selectivity of a novel pan-RAS inhibitor in 3D bioprinted organoid tumor models

De Nobrega, D. D.; Eiler, L. C.; Ahirwar, P.; Rawal, U. P.; Crawford, C. L.; Buchsbaum, D. J.; Keeton, A. B.; Maxuitenko, Y. Y.; Chen, X.; Piazza, G. A.; Tsung, A.; Budhwani, K. I.

2025-03-01 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.02.25.640132 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) remains a significant global health burden, with KRAS mutations driving [~]40% of cases. Efficacy of recently approved, mutant-specific KRAS inhibitors is limited by intrinsic and adaptive resistance mechanisms. Pan-RAS inhibitors, such as ADT-007, offer broader therapeutic potential by targeting multiple RAS isoforms. Here, we evaluate ADT-007 in 3D bioprinted organoid tumors (BOTs) generated from KRAS-mutant and RAS wild-type (WT) CRC cell lines. MethodsPotency and selectivity of ADT-007 were compared to bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, and YM155, a survivin inhibitor, using high-content imaging and ATP-based luminescence assays. Mechanistic studies assessed impact on RAS activation and downstream signaling. ResultsADT-007 exhibited high potency and selectivity in KRAS-mutant BOTs, reducing tumor burdens >30% at nanomolar concentrations, and demonstrated superior selectivity over bortezomib and YM155 with minimal cytotoxicity in RAS-WT BOTs. Mechanistic analysis confirmed ADT-007 inhibited RAS activation and downstream signaling, leading to selective apoptosis induction in KRAS-mutant CRC cells. ConclusionsThe selective potency and specificity of ADT-007 warrants further investigation of pan-RAS inhibitors for treating RAS-driven cancers. This study also underscores the translational utility of 3D BOT models for preclinical drug response assessment. Further validation in patient-derived BOTs is necessary to evaluate potential of ADT-007 in clinical settings.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
31.7%
2
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 22%
4.4%
4
ACS Chemical Biology
167 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.3%
5
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
ACS Central Science
71 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.5%
7
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
8
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
9
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 46%
1.9%
10
Cell Chemical Biology
94 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
11
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.8%
12
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Pharmacology
111 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
14
Science Signaling
65 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
15
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
16
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
102 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
17
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.2%
18
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.2%
20
Molecular Therapy
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
21
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.2%
22
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
23
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
40 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
24
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.9%
25
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
Hepatology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
27
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
28
Nature Biomedical Engineering
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
29
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.9%
30
Clinical and Translational Medicine
31 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%