Breast cancer multigene germline panel testing in mainstream oncology based on clinical-public health utility (cancer mortality benefit): ESMO Precision Oncology Working Group recommendations
Turnbull, C.; Achatz, M. I.; Balmana, J.; Castro, E.; Curigliano, G.; Cybulski, C.; Domchek, S.; Evans, D. G.; Hanson, H.; Hoogerbrugge, N.; James, P. A.; Krause, A.; Nathanson, K. L.; Ngeow Yuen Yie, J.; Robson, M.; Tischkowitz, M.; Westphalen, B.; Foulkes, W.
Show abstract
BackgroundWith widening therapeutic indications, germline genetic testing is offered to an increasing proportion of patients with breast cancer (BC) via mainstream oncology services. However, the gene set tested varies widely from just BRCA1/BRCA2 through to pan-cancer panels of near 100 genes. If a germline pathogenic variant (GPV) is detected, the BC proband and other family GPV-carriers may be offered interventions such as risk-reducing surgery and decades of intensive surveillance for the various cancers linked to that gene. MethodsESMOs Precision Oncology Working Group established an international expert group in breast cancer germline genetics. This group firstly established a framework of criteria by which to evaluate each breast cancer susceptibility gene (BCSG) for inclusion on a breast cancer multigene panel test (BC-MGPT) for universal mainstream testing for BC cases. Next the panel scored BCSGs for gene utility regarding (i) BC risk estimation, (ii) clinical actionability (iii) evidence of impact on cancer-specific mortality (and/or morbidity). ResultsThe group agreed genes should be included on the BC-MGPT based on potential cancer-specific mortality (and/or morbidity) benefit. Judged as of high or moderate utility on this basis were 7 genes: BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, RAD51C, RAD51D and TP53 (for BC diagnosed <40 years), with BRIP1 later added. Whilst potentially informative for BC risk estimation, CHEK2 and ATM were judged to offer insufficient evidence for improving cancer-specific mortality. The expert group recommended strongly against inclusion of syndromic genes such as STK11, PTEN, NF1 and CDH1. ConclusionWith expanded germline testing in patients with BC (and cascade testing into families), the number and nature of resultant GPV carriers identified will be dictated by the genes included on the upfront BC-MGPT. The potential harms, opportunity and economic costs of decades of surveillance of multiple organs and risk-reducing surgeries should be outweighed by strong evidence of meaningful benefit, improved cancer-specific mortality (and/or morbidity). HighlightsO_LIESMO expert panel settled a list of genes for inclusion on a BC-MGPT based on potential cancer-specific mortality benefit C_LIO_LIThis BC-MGPT should include 7 genes: BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, RAD51C, RAD51D, BRIP1 and TP53 (for BC diagnosed <40 years) C_LIO_LIThis BC-MGPT would service urgent diagnostic mainstreaming germline testing requirements for all eligible BC cases C_LIO_LI Syndromic genes such as STK11, PTEN, NF1 and CDH1 should only be tested downstream post expert review in a minority of BC C_LIO_LIThe mortality benefit was deemed equivocal for ATM and CHEK2, being primarily of intermediate penetrance for ER-positive BC C_LI
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of genetic counselling strategy on diagnostic yield and workload for whole genome sequencing-based tumour diagnostics 92%
- Classification of Variants of Reduced Penetrance in High Penetrance Cancer Susceptibility Genes: Framework for Genetics Clinicians and Clinical Scientists by CanVIG-UK (Cancer Variant Interpretation Group-UK) 91%
- Performance of polygenic risk scores for cancer prediction in a racially diverse academic biobank 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Comprehensive Epithelial Tubo-Ovarian Cancer Risk Prediction Model Incorporating Genetic and Epidemiological Risk Factors 93%
- Estimating cancer risk in carriers of Lynch syndrome variants in UK Biobank 93%
- Validation of the BOADICEA Model in a Prospective Cohort of BRCA1/2 Pathogenic Variant Carriers 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- BRCA-DIRECT digital pathway for diagnostic germline genetic testing within a UK breast oncology setting: a randomised, non-inferiority trial 94%
- Distinct temporal trends in breast cancer incidence from 1997 to 2016 by molecular subtypes: A population-based study of Scottish cancer registry data 93%
- Patient attrition in Molecular Tumour Boards: A Review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association of Gene Variant Type and Location with Breast Cancer Risk in the General Population 95%
- Prevalence and mutational determinants of high tumor mutation burden in breast cancer 92%
- Reversion and non-reversion mechanisms of resistance to PARP inhibitor or platinum chemotherapy in BRCA1/2-mutant metastatic breast cancer 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative validation of the BOADICEA and Tyrer-Cuzick breast cancer risk models incorporating classical risk factors and polygenic risk in a population-based prospective cohort 92%
- Sex steroid hormones and risk of breast cancer incidence and survival: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study 92%
- Common variants in breast cancer risk loci predispose to distinct tumor subtypes 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.