Back

Virus infection of honey bee queens alters lipid profiles and indirectly suppresses a retinue pheromone component via reducing ovary mass

McAfee, A.; Chapman, A.; Magana, A. A.; Marshall, K.; Hoover, S. E.; Tarpy, D. R.; Foster, L. J.

2025-02-26 physiology
10.1101/2025.02.24.639811 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Virus infections reduce honey bee (Apis mellifera) ovary mass (in part due to resource-allocation trade-offs with immunity) and are linked to the presence of supersedure cells in colonies, indicating that workers are attempting to replace their queen. Pheromones, lipids, and lipid transport proteins could mediate relationships among virus infection, ovary mass, and supersedure. When we infected honey bee queens in the laboratory and profiled their queen retinue pheromone (QRP) components from head extracts, we found that virus infections specifically reduced the QRP component methyl oleate. Data from an observational field study were consistent with this pattern. Lipidomics analysis of the same extracts suggests that virus infection decreases triacylglycerol abundances (major sources of stored energy). Reducing ovary mass via laying restriction was sufficient to lower methyl oleate abundance [-] suggesting that virus infection reduces methyl oleate indirectly via ovary effects [-] but was insufficient to reduce abundance of most triacylglycerols or stimulate immune effector expression. Abundance of circulating apolipophorin-III, a lipid transporter and putative potentiator of immune effectors, was lower in queens with restricted laying, suggesting that its expression may be controlled by nutrient availability while its immune-stimulating capacity is governed by other mechanisms. Prior research has shown that queen pheromone blends lacking methyl oleate are less attractive to workers; therefore, diminishing methyl oleate could result in a less desirable pheromone bouquet and possibly stimulate supersedure. The mechanism of methyl oleate reduction is yet to be determined, but is clearly tied to ovary size and possibly resource availability or mobilization.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.