Back

Explainable AI techniques for dynamic functional brain imaging: validation and analysis of E/I imbalance in autism

Strock, A.; Nghiem, T.-A. E.; De Lecea, A.; Hassan, A.; Ryali, S.; Menon, V.

2025-02-25 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.02.24.639808 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Deep neural networks have revolutionized functional neuroimaging analysis but remain "black boxes," concealing which brain mechanisms and regions drive their predictions--a critical limitation for clinical neuroscience. Here we develop and validate an explainable AI (xAI) framework to test whether feature attribution techniques can reliably recover brain regions affected by excitation/inhibition (E/I) imbalance--a fundamental dysregulation implicated in autism, schizophrenia, and other neuropsychiatric disorders. We employed complementary simulation approaches: recurrent neural networks for controlled parameter exploration, and The Virtual Brain simulator incorporating empirically-derived human and mouse connectomes to model E/I balance alterations with unprecedented biological realism. Through systematic validation, we demonstrate that Integrated Gradients and DeepLIFT methods reliably identify brain regions affected by E/I imbalance across challenging conditions, including high noise, low prevalence, and subtle neurophysiological alterations. This performance remains robust across species and anatomical scales, from 68-region human to 426-region mouse connectomes. Application to the ABIDE autism dataset (N=834) reveal convergence between our biophysically grounded simulations and empirical findings, providing computational support for E/I imbalance mechanisms in autism. This work establishes essential tools and data for interpretation of deep learning models in functional neuroimaging, and enables hypothesis-driven analysis of cellular mechanisms across neuropsychiatric disorders.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.