BayesCurveFit: Enhancing Curve Fitting for Early-Stage Compound Screening Using Bayesian Inference
Du, N.; Chen, Y.; Qian, Y.
Show abstract
Accurate curve fitting is central to quantifying dose-response relationships in drug discovery. However, commonly used regression-based methods are ill-suited for early prescreening assays, where measurements are sparse and experimental noise can dominate. Bayesian approaches have been developed previously, but they are rarely optimized for such data-limited, noise-prone conditions. We present BayesCurveFit, a Bayesian framework specifically designed for robust dose-response inference under data scarcity. The workflow integrates calibrated initialization, stochastic optimization, adaptive posterior sampling, and probabilistic mixture modeling within a unified Bayesian pipeline, enabling reliable parameter estimation and uncertainty quantification from few observations. By modeling residuals with a Gaussian-Laplace hybrid distribution, BayesCurveFit remains robust to outliers where ordinary least squares and conventional regression methods fail. Simulation studies and real screening benchmarks demonstrate that BayesCurveFit outperforms state-of-the-art regression-based methods in recovering true dose-response relationships under limited sampling. In addition, a Bayesian measure of significance - posterior error probability - offers interpretable probabilistic confidence for response classification. Together, these features establish a general and easy-to-use Bayesian framework for analyzing dose-response data in early screening experiments.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- AdapToR: Adaptive Topological Regression for quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling 93%
- Chemical Genomics Language Model toward Reliable and Explainable Compound-Protein Interaction Exploration 90%
- DrugDiff - small molecule diffusion model with flexible guidance towards molecular properties 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.